P03.03.B PREVALENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF INCIDENTAL PET FINDINGS IN THE BRAIN USING RADIOTRACERS OTHER THAN [18F]FDG: A META-ANALYSIS

Abstract BACKGROUND Incidental brain imaging findings could be clinically relevant and advancements in molecular imaging could lead to a more frequent identification. The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to establish the prevalence and the clinical significance of brain incidentalomas at PET (BIP) using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search of studies about BIP was carried out. Four different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Google Scholar) were screened until April 2025. Only original articles about BIP using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG were selected. Three review authors independently performed the literature search, the article selection and the data extraction. A proportion meta-analysis on the prevalence and significance of BIP was carried out on a patient-based analysis using a random-effects model. RESULTS 14 studies (11211 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, 6 using somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET, 5 using choline-PET, one using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET, one using [18F]FDOPA-PET and one using [18F]Fluciclovine-PET. The pooled prevalence of BIP was 4.6% for SSTR-PET, 1.1% for choline-PET, 1.2% for PSMA-PET, 1.4% for [18F]FDOPA-PET and 2.5% for [18F]Fluciclovine-PET. When BIP were further evaluated using MRI, meningiomas were the most frequent lesions detected but both benign and malignant lesions could be incidentally diagnosed. Moderate statistical heterogeneity was found in the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION BIP using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG are not rare, in particular for SSTR-PET, further justifying the extension of PET scans to the brain when radiotracers other than [18F]FDG are used. When detected, a BIP should be further evaluated using brain MRI. Meningioma is the most common lesion causing a BIP but both benign and malignant lesions could be incidentally detected. Further studies are warranted to better clarify the clinical impact of BIP detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.162
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P03.03.B PREVALENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF INCIDENTAL PET FINDINGS IN THE BRAIN USING RADIOTRACERS OTHER THAN [18F]FDG: A META-ANALYSIS

Giorgio Treglia, Gaetano Paone, Marco Cuzzocrea, Barbara Muoio et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

P03.03.B PREVALENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF INCIDENTAL PET FINDINGS IN THE BRAIN USING RADIOTRACERS OTHER THAN [18F]FDG: A META-ANALYSIS

Giorgio Treglia, Gaetano Paone, Marco Cuzzocrea, Barbara Muoio, Domenico Albano, Alessio Rizzo, Cesare Michele Iacovitti
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Incidental brain imaging findings could be clinically relevant and advancements in molecular imaging could lead to a more frequent identification. The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to establish the prevalence and the clinical significance of brain incidentalomas at PET (BIP) using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search of studies about BIP was carried out. Four different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Google Scholar) were screened until April 2025. Only original articles about BIP using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG were selected. Three review authors independently performed the literature search, the article selection and the data extraction. A proportion meta-analysis on the prevalence and significance of BIP was carried out on a patient-based analysis using a random-effects model. RESULTS 14 studies (11211 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, 6 using somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET, 5 using choline-PET, one using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET, one using [18F]FDOPA-PET and one using [18F]Fluciclovine-PET. The pooled prevalence of BIP was 4.6% for SSTR-PET, 1.1% for choline-PET, 1.2% for PSMA-PET, 1.4% for [18F]FDOPA-PET and 2.5% for [18F]Fluciclovine-PET. When BIP were further evaluated using MRI, meningiomas were the most frequent lesions detected but both benign and malignant lesions could be incidentally diagnosed. Moderate statistical heterogeneity was found in the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION BIP using radiotracers other than [18F]FDG are not rare, in particular for SSTR-PET, further justifying the extension of PET scans to the brain when radiotracers other than [18F]FDG are used. When detected, a BIP should be further evaluated using brain MRI. Meningioma is the most common lesion causing a BIP but both benign and malignant lesions could be incidentally detected. Further studies are warranted to better clarify the clinical impact of BIP detection.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
Brescia University (US), Institute of Oncology Research (CH), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.