P18.10.B INTER- AND INTRATUMORAL DRUG RESPONSE HETEROGENEITY IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A COMPARATIVE ORGANOID-BASED ANALYSIS OF TEMOZOLOMIDE AND VORTIOXETINE

Abstract BACKGROUND Inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity represents a major obstacle to the effective treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), contributing to therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Vortioxetine, a multimodal antidepressant, has recently been suggested to exert antitumor effects in GBM. This study investigates the heterogeneous intra- and intertumoral response to vortioxetine in patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in comparison to the standard chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ). MATERIAL AND METHODS Initially, IC₅₀ concentrations for TMZ and vortioxetine were determined for established GBM cell lines (U138, GaMG, U87), and further validated in PDOs. These concentrations were then used to treat PDOs from three different patients as well as multiple spatially distinct regions from a single tumor to determine the temporal dynamics of vortioxetine response. Over a 10-day period, cell viability was monitored every other day using the Alamar Blue assay. Subsequently, PDOs from eight GBM patients and from multiple tumor regions within each patient were treated with TMZ and vortioxetine at the identified optimal time point to assess inter- and intratumoral differences in drug response by the same assay. RESULTS IC₅₀ values were determined in 2D cell culture as 1.0 mM for TMZ and 9.79 µM for vortioxetine, and refined for PDOs to 3.3 mM and 22.15 µM, respectively. Day 8 was identified as the optimal time point for assessing vortioxetine response and therefore used for the subsequent experiment. Vortioxetine showed significantly greater efficacy than TMZ in PDOs from all 8 patients (p < 0.0001). Significant intertumoral differences in sensitivity were observed (p = 0.015). Intratumoral heterogeneity was only evident in one single patient with distinct regional responses to vortioxetine (p = 0.0128). CONCLUSION Vortioxetine exhibits superior efficacy compared to TMZ in GBM PDOs, with significant intertumoral variability in treatment response. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for tumor heterogeneity when evaluating novel therapeutic strategies and support the potential of vortioxetine as a candidate for further investigation in GBM therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.574
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P18.10.B INTER- AND INTRATUMORAL DRUG RESPONSE HETEROGENEITY IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A COMPARATIVE ORGANOID-BASED ANALYSIS OF TEMOZOLOMIDE AND VORTIOXETINE

Katharina Mehling, Carsten Hagemann, Robert Nickl, Johannes Messinger et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

P18.10.B INTER- AND INTRATUMORAL DRUG RESPONSE HETEROGENEITY IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A COMPARATIVE ORGANOID-BASED ANALYSIS OF TEMOZOLOMIDE AND VORTIOXETINE

Katharina Mehling, Carsten Hagemann, Robert Nickl, Johannes Messinger, Vera Nickl, Camelia‐Maria Monoranu, Friederike Liesche‐Starnecker, Jennifer A. Mazzoni, Emanuel Meller, G. Haug, Eva Roth, J Hiebl
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity represents a major obstacle to the effective treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), contributing to therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. Vortioxetine, a multimodal antidepressant, has recently been suggested to exert antitumor effects in GBM. This study investigates the heterogeneous intra- and intertumoral response to vortioxetine in patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in comparison to the standard chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide (TMZ). MATERIAL AND METHODS Initially, IC₅₀ concentrations for TMZ and vortioxetine were determined for established GBM cell lines (U138, GaMG, U87), and further validated in PDOs. These concentrations were then used to treat PDOs from three different patients as well as multiple spatially distinct regions from a single tumor to determine the temporal dynamics of vortioxetine response. Over a 10-day period, cell viability was monitored every other day using the Alamar Blue assay. Subsequently, PDOs from eight GBM patients and from multiple tumor regions within each patient were treated with TMZ and vortioxetine at the identified optimal time point to assess inter- and intratumoral differences in drug response by the same assay. RESULTS IC₅₀ values were determined in 2D cell culture as 1.0 mM for TMZ and 9.79 µM for vortioxetine, and refined for PDOs to 3.3 mM and 22.15 µM, respectively. Day 8 was identified as the optimal time point for assessing vortioxetine response and therefore used for the subsequent experiment. Vortioxetine showed significantly greater efficacy than TMZ in PDOs from all 8 patients (p < 0.0001). Significant intertumoral differences in sensitivity were observed (p = 0.015). Intratumoral heterogeneity was only evident in one single patient with distinct regional responses to vortioxetine (p = 0.0128). CONCLUSION Vortioxetine exhibits superior efficacy compared to TMZ in GBM PDOs, with significant intertumoral variability in treatment response. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for tumor heterogeneity when evaluating novel therapeutic strategies and support the potential of vortioxetine as a candidate for further investigation in GBM therapy.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
Augsburg University (US), University of Augsburg (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.