P04.10.A ARE FOUNDATIONAL AI SPEECH MODELS READY FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY? THE BRAINAPP STUDY SAYS “NOT YET”

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary brain tumours (BTs) can cause diverse neurological deficits, including speech impairments. An objective and rapid speech assessment method is crucial for effective patient monitoring, support, and rehabilitation. However, current methods to assess speech in BT patients can be laborious and imprecise. Automated assessment systems could overcome these limitations—but they have yet to be evaluated on BT speech. This is hampered by the lack of public speech datasets (corpora) and well-documented BT-related speech impairments. MATERIALS & METHODS To address this need, we curated the world’s first BT speech corpus via The BrainApp Study. To the best of our knowledge, it is also the first study to employ remote, mobile-based BT speech collection methods. The corpus consists of 285 intelligible read speech audio samples from 35 participants, with 27 patients contributing 186 samples. Ground truth for participant audios was established through manual transcription of each file. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on these transcriptions to characterise speech patterns. We then applied state-of-the-art (SOTA) artificial intelligence (AI) speech-to-text models (Whisper and Wav2Vec2) to each audio sample, and compared the results to the ground truth. RESULTS Ground truth analysis revealed that BT patients produced linguistic errors in the form of word repetition, insertion, substitution, and deletion. These appear to be influenced by tumour location, laterality, and grade. Neither Whisper nor Wav2Vec2 successfully captured these abnormalities. Furthermore, both models introduced errors not present in the original audio i.e. hallucinating. CONCLUSION BT-related speech impairments produce measurable linguistic errors that current AI models fail to recognise. Future work will focus on developing automated speech analytic systems informed by these objective speech markers and on refining existing SOTA models. We hope this will lay the foundations for speech analytics in neuro-oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.196
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P04.10.A ARE FOUNDATIONAL AI SPEECH MODELS READY FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY? THE BRAINAPP STUDY SAYS “NOT YET”

Bryan Williams, Naveed Anwar, Lucia Specia
Neuro-Oncology
Topic Modeling
article

P04.10.A ARE FOUNDATIONAL AI SPEECH MODELS READY FOR NEURO-ONCOLOGY? THE BRAINAPP STUDY SAYS “NOT YET”

Bryan Williams, Naveed Anwar, Lucia Specia
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary brain tumours (BTs) can cause diverse neurological deficits, including speech impairments. An objective and rapid speech assessment method is crucial for effective patient monitoring, support, and rehabilitation. However, current methods to assess speech in BT patients can be laborious and imprecise. Automated assessment systems could overcome these limitations—but they have yet to be evaluated on BT speech. This is hampered by the lack of public speech datasets (corpora) and well-documented BT-related speech impairments. MATERIALS & METHODS To address this need, we curated the world’s first BT speech corpus via The BrainApp Study. To the best of our knowledge, it is also the first study to employ remote, mobile-based BT speech collection methods. The corpus consists of 285 intelligible read speech audio samples from 35 participants, with 27 patients contributing 186 samples. Ground truth for participant audios was established through manual transcription of each file. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on these transcriptions to characterise speech patterns. We then applied state-of-the-art (SOTA) artificial intelligence (AI) speech-to-text models (Whisper and Wav2Vec2) to each audio sample, and compared the results to the ground truth. RESULTS Ground truth analysis revealed that BT patients produced linguistic errors in the form of word repetition, insertion, substitution, and deletion. These appear to be influenced by tumour location, laterality, and grade. Neither Whisper nor Wav2Vec2 successfully captured these abnormalities. Furthermore, both models introduced errors not present in the original audio i.e. hallucinating. CONCLUSION BT-related speech impairments produce measurable linguistic errors that current AI models fail to recognise. Future work will focus on developing automated speech analytic systems informed by these objective speech markers and on refining existing SOTA models. We hope this will lay the foundations for speech analytics in neuro-oncology.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.