P06.12.B THE COGNITIVE BENEFITS OF RTMS: A META-ANALYSIS ACROSS HEALTH AND DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive deficits are common across numerous neurological and psychiatric conditions, including patients with brain tumors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique; however, its efficacy for improving cognitive functioning remains to be established. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive functioning through a meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS A PRISMA systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing active versus sham (placebo) rTMS, with cognitive outcomes reported as either primary or secondary endpoints in individuals with psychiatric/neurological conditions or healthy volunteers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect sizes of rTMS on global cognition, cognitive screeners (MMSE/MoCA) and specific cognitive domains, including attention, memory, information processing speed, working memory, executive function, language, and social cognition. RESULTS A total of 108 studies were included, comprising 4265 participants (2173 active, 2092 sham). Active rTMS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall cognitive functioning compared to sham, with a pooled effect size of Hedges’ g = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Significant cognitive improvements were observed across all domains, with small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’g range: 0.15-0.79). The strongest evidence for beneficial effects of rTMS was found for executive functioning (g = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.24), language (g = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.27-0.44), and memory functioning (g = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18-0.40). However, substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes was observed across studies (I²= 10.3-92.6%), indicating that a proportion of the variability in results is likely due to differences in study populations, treatment protocols, or cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports the transdiagnostic efficacy of rTMS for cognitive improvement, with small to moderate effects observed across a broad spectrum of populations and cognitive domains. These findings highlight the clinical utility of rTMS as a cognitive intervention - potentially also in brain tumor patients, for whom preliminary studies to this effect are underway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.244
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P06.12.B THE COGNITIVE BENEFITS OF RTMS: A META-ANALYSIS ACROSS HEALTH AND DISEASE

M Gorter, Bernhard Frank, Ab Malik Marwan Ali, Martin Klein et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

P06.12.B THE COGNITIVE BENEFITS OF RTMS: A META-ANALYSIS ACROSS HEALTH AND DISEASE

M Gorter, Bernhard Frank, Ab Malik Marwan Ali, Martin Klein, Philip de Witt Hamer, Michael D. Jenkinson, Rasheed Zakaria, Linda Douw
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive deficits are common across numerous neurological and psychiatric conditions, including patients with brain tumors. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique; however, its efficacy for improving cognitive functioning remains to be established. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive functioning through a meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS A PRISMA systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing active versus sham (placebo) rTMS, with cognitive outcomes reported as either primary or secondary endpoints in individuals with psychiatric/neurological conditions or healthy volunteers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect sizes of rTMS on global cognition, cognitive screeners (MMSE/MoCA) and specific cognitive domains, including attention, memory, information processing speed, working memory, executive function, language, and social cognition. RESULTS A total of 108 studies were included, comprising 4265 participants (2173 active, 2092 sham). Active rTMS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall cognitive functioning compared to sham, with a pooled effect size of Hedges’ g = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Significant cognitive improvements were observed across all domains, with small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’g range: 0.15-0.79). The strongest evidence for beneficial effects of rTMS was found for executive functioning (g = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.24), language (g = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.27-0.44), and memory functioning (g = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.18-0.40). However, substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes was observed across studies (I²= 10.3-92.6%), indicating that a proportion of the variability in results is likely due to differences in study populations, treatment protocols, or cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports the transdiagnostic efficacy of rTMS for cognitive improvement, with small to moderate effects observed across a broad spectrum of populations and cognitive domains. These findings highlight the clinical utility of rTMS as a cognitive intervention - potentially also in brain tumor patients, for whom preliminary studies to this effect are underway.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
University of Liverpool (GB), Dutch Cancer Society (NL), Walton Centre (GB), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.