Bioderived, 3D-Printable, and Biocompatible Polycarbonate/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds

Regenerative strategies for bone repair would benefit from scaffolds that are mechanically resilient and biologically compatible. We present a fully bioderived and 3D-printable composite scaffold that meets these requirements while offering environmental sustainability through the integration of CO2-derived eugenol polycarbonate, bioderived cross-linkers, and hydroxyapatite (HAp) reinforcement. This scaffold exhibits excellent thermal stability (Tg ≥ 60 °C and Td ≥ 350 °C) and robust mechanical properties (flexural modulus ∼ 2.54 GPa and compressive modulus ∼ 220 MPa), aligning with the mechanical properties of human trabecular bone and outperforming reported polymer/HAp composites. It demonstrates exceptional creep resistance (∼0.82% strain under 3 MPa for 24 h), ensuring long-term mechanical integrity under physiological loads. A UV-assisted direct ink writing (DIW) technique, followed by post-UV curing, fabricates precise 3D structures that support cell attachment. The hydrophilicity of the scaffold is tunable via surface modifications to optimize cell-material interactions. In vitro cytocompatibility studies using MC3T3 preosteoblasts show >91% viability. Under simulated physiological conditions (PBS, 37 °C), the scaffold shows negligible mass loss over 18 weeks. Compared to conventional 3D-printed scaffolds that rely on petrochemical feedstocks and exhibit weaker mechanical resilience, this sustainable system offers a compelling combination of printability, mechanical robustness, and biocompatibility with potential for advanced bone regenerative therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06987
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioderived, 3D-Printable, and Biocompatible Polycarbonate/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds

Peiran Wei, Emily Pentzer, Mani Sengoden, Naushad Ahmed et al.
1 citations
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
article

Bioderived, 3D-Printable, and Biocompatible Polycarbonate/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds

Peiran Wei, Emily Pentzer, Mani Sengoden, Naushad Ahmed, Soon‐Mi Lim, Chia‐Min Hsieh, Justin A. Smolen, Donald J. Darensbourg, Karen L. Wooley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Regenerative strategies for bone repair would benefit from scaffolds that are mechanically resilient and biologically compatible. We present a fully bioderived and 3D-printable composite scaffold that meets these requirements while offering environmental sustainability through the integration of CO2-derived eugenol polycarbonate, bioderived cross-linkers, and hydroxyapatite (HAp) reinforcement. This scaffold exhibits excellent thermal stability (Tg ≥ 60 °C and Td ≥ 350 °C) and robust mechanical properties (flexural modulus ∼ 2.54 GPa and compressive modulus ∼ 220 MPa), aligning with the mechanical properties of human trabecular bone and outperforming reported polymer/HAp composites. It demonstrates exceptional creep resistance (∼0.82% strain under 3 MPa for 24 h), ensuring long-term mechanical integrity under physiological loads. A UV-assisted direct ink writing (DIW) technique, followed by post-UV curing, fabricates precise 3D structures that support cell attachment. The hydrophilicity of the scaffold is tunable via surface modifications to optimize cell-material interactions. In vitro cytocompatibility studies using MC3T3 preosteoblasts show >91% viability. Under simulated physiological conditions (PBS, 37 °C), the scaffold shows negligible mass loss over 18 weeks. Compared to conventional 3D-printed scaffolds that rely on petrochemical feedstocks and exhibit weaker mechanical resilience, this sustainable system offers a compelling combination of printability, mechanical robustness, and biocompatibility with potential for advanced bone regenerative therapies.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringVol. 13(41)
Mitchell Institute (US), Centre for Nano and Soft Matter Sciences (IN), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.