Comparison of Kinematic and Kinetic Reward Functions for RL for Robot Grasping

Robotic grasping is a complex challenge due to the interplay of perception, planning, and control, but learning-based approaches excel at handling high-dimensional gripper configurations, optimizing contact points, and adapting to dynamic environments. This work explores reinforcement learning (RL)-based robotic grasping using an anthropomorphic LEAP hand model. We investigate the effectiveness of different reward functions—kinematic (positional) and kinetic (contact force) feedback—on grasping performance. The work is implemented in the MuJoCo simulation environment, and policies are trained using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. While kinetic rewards demonstrate potential, the findings highlight limitations in current RL methodologies, such as susceptibility to overfitting and an inability to fully generalize. Future directions include integrating human feedback into reward functions and exploring model-based RL to address environment dynamics more comprehensively.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.175951357.73956557/v1
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Kinematic and Kinetic Reward Functions for RL for Robot Grasping

S. Patwardhan, Kunal Kumar Sahoo, Hemand Surya M
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Comparison of Kinematic and Kinetic Reward Functions for RL for Robot Grasping

S. Patwardhan, Kunal Kumar Sahoo, Hemand Surya M
article en

Abstract

Robotic grasping is a complex challenge due to the interplay of perception, planning, and control, but learning-based approaches excel at handling high-dimensional gripper configurations, optimizing contact points, and adapting to dynamic environments. This work explores reinforcement learning (RL)-based robotic grasping using an anthropomorphic LEAP hand model. We investigate the effectiveness of different reward functions—kinematic (positional) and kinetic (contact force) feedback—on grasping performance. The work is implemented in the MuJoCo simulation environment, and policies are trained using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. While kinetic rewards demonstrate potential, the findings highlight limitations in current RL methodologies, such as susceptibility to overfitting and an inability to fully generalize. Future directions include integrating human feedback into reward functions and exploring model-based RL to address environment dynamics more comprehensively.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Kinematic and Kinetic Reward Functions for RL for Robot Grasping — S. Patwardhan, Kunal Kumar Sahoo, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS