An Oversampling-Enhanced Multi-Class Imbalanced Classification Framework for Patient Health Status Prediction Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), directly captured from cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy, play a crucial role in guiding clinicians' counseling on treatment-related toxicities. Accurate prediction and assessment of symptoms and health status linked to PROs are essential for improving clinical decision-making and planning post-treatment support as patients transition into survivorship. However, raw PRO data collected in clinical settings presents two inherent challenges, including data sparsity (due to incomplete item responses) and imbalanced toxicity distributions. These factors complicate predictive modeling. This study investigates advanced machine learning techniques to address these challenges by predicting outcomes such as pain and sleep disturbances using PRO datasets from a cancer therapy center. We implement advanced classifiers (i.e., RF, XGBoost, GB, SVM, MLP-Bagging, and LR) for multi-class imbalance tasks across three cancers. To address the minority cases, we apply oversampling while preserving class ratios. Experimental results demonstrate RF and XGBoost's strong generalization, highlighting their utility in categorizing post-therapy severity levels for clinical decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3617316
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Oversampling-Enhanced Multi-Class Imbalanced Classification Framework for Patient Health Status Prediction Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

Xinglei Shen, Jay Shiao, Cai Xu, Ronald C. Chen et al.
1 citations
IEEE Access
Medical Coding and Health Information
2.94
article

An Oversampling-Enhanced Multi-Class Imbalanced Classification Framework for Patient Health Status Prediction Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

Xinglei Shen, Jay Shiao, Cai Xu, Ronald C. Chen, John Einck, Hao Gao, Yang Yan, Zhong Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), directly captured from cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy, play a crucial role in guiding clinicians' counseling on treatment-related toxicities. Accurate prediction and assessment of symptoms and health status linked to PROs are essential for improving clinical decision-making and planning post-treatment support as patients transition into survivorship. However, raw PRO data collected in clinical settings presents two inherent challenges, including data sparsity (due to incomplete item responses) and imbalanced toxicity distributions. These factors complicate predictive modeling. This study investigates advanced machine learning techniques to address these challenges by predicting outcomes such as pain and sleep disturbances using PRO datasets from a cancer therapy center. We implement advanced classifiers (i.e., RF, XGBoost, GB, SVM, MLP-Bagging, and LR) for multi-class imbalance tasks across three cancers. To address the minority cases, we apply oversampling while preserving class ratios. Experimental results demonstrate RF and XGBoost's strong generalization, highlighting their utility in categorizing post-therapy severity levels for clinical decision support.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Ohio University (US), Border Network for Human Rights (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas at El Paso
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Medical Coding and Health Information
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.