ANALYSIS OF THE TERM ГРОШОВІ КОШТИ IN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC AND LINGUISTIC DISCOURSES

The Ukrainian term грошові кошти is ubiquitous in national legislation yet remains semantically unstable: definitions conflict, English renderings diverge (‘cash,’ ‘funds,’ ‘money’), and linguists condemn the phrase as a tautological calque from Russian bureaucratic style. Early sources, however, show that кошти once meant ‘expenses,’ borrowed through Polish koszt (< M.H.G. kosten), so the compound reflects a historical shift from generic outlays to specifically monetary assets rather than being a simple redundancy. Modern scholarship is equally divided: one camp limits грошові кошти to physical cash; another adds all highly-liquid instruments; theoretics treat it as any unit of monetary value. This terminological issue complicates accounting practice, statutory translation, and comparative research. Resolving it demands coordinated work by linguists, economists, lawyers, and translators to agree on a stable definition and uniform English equivalent, thereby improving clarity in Ukrainian statutes and international documents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ГРААЛЬ НАУКИ
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.23.05.2025.032
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF THE TERM ГРОШОВІ КОШТИ IN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC AND LINGUISTIC DISCOURSES

В. О. Ганусич, Natalia A. Lavrova, Yurii Petrov
ГРААЛЬ НАУКИ
linguistics and terminology studies
article

ANALYSIS OF THE TERM ГРОШОВІ КОШТИ IN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC AND LINGUISTIC DISCOURSES

В. О. Ганусич, Natalia A. Lavrova, Yurii Petrov
article en

Abstract

The Ukrainian term грошові кошти is ubiquitous in national legislation yet remains semantically unstable: definitions conflict, English renderings diverge (‘cash,’ ‘funds,’ ‘money’), and linguists condemn the phrase as a tautological calque from Russian bureaucratic style. Early sources, however, show that кошти once meant ‘expenses,’ borrowed through Polish koszt (< M.H.G. kosten), so the compound reflects a historical shift from generic outlays to specifically monetary assets rather than being a simple redundancy. Modern scholarship is equally divided: one camp limits грошові кошти to physical cash; another adds all highly-liquid instruments; theoretics treat it as any unit of monetary value. This terminological issue complicates accounting practice, statutory translation, and comparative research. Resolving it demands coordinated work by linguists, economists, lawyers, and translators to agree on a stable definition and uniform English equivalent, thereby improving clarity in Ukrainian statutes and international documents.

ГРААЛЬ НАУКИ(52)
Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.