Agricultural management-driven soil inorganic carbon dynamics: Evidence from Chinese field experiments

• Overall, agricultural practices reduced SIC stock but increased SOC and TC stocks. • MF and SR reduced SIC stock, especially under low MAT and high MAP conditions. • OMF vs . NF achieved the optimal balance between SIC stock and crop yield. • Soil depth, nitrogen fertilizer, and duration were key factors affecting SIC stock. • SIC stock varied regionally: increasing in the NWC and decreasing in the NEC and EC. Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is a crucial component of soil carbon pool, impacting climate change and ecosystem functions. SIC is affected by drastic changes in agricultural practices, while its response remains uncertain. We synthesized 54 field studies in China to assess the impact of agricultural practices on soil carbon stock, focusing on SIC and its responses to environmental factors. Overall, agricultural practices significantly reduced SIC stock (3.37 %) while increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stock (15.41 %) and total carbon stock (6.80 %). Carbon pool changes could be categorized as follows: synergistic increases in SIC and SOC; trade-offs between SOC increases and SIC decreases; and individual effects on either SOC or SIC. SIC varied significantly across practices and regions, driven by climate, field management, and soil properties. Mineral fertilizer and straw return caused SIC losses, particularly under low-temperatures (MAT < 10 ℃), high-rainfall (MAP > 400 mm), and after 30 years. Severe SIC losses were observed in Northeast and East China. Combining organic and mineral fertilizers optimized the balance between SIC and crop yield, especially in arid regions. Key factors affecting SIC stock included soil depth, nitrogen addition, and experimental duration. Furthermore, our meta -analysis revealed that the distinct responses of SIC and SOC to agricultural practices underscored the necessity of integrated management strategies that effectively balanced SOC sequestration with SIC conservation. This study enhances understanding of SIC cycle and provides scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117535
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural management-driven soil inorganic carbon dynamics: Evidence from Chinese field experiments

Laura L. Van Eerd, Zhenhong Hu, Z. Wang, Jinsong Huang et al.
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Agricultural management-driven soil inorganic carbon dynamics: Evidence from Chinese field experiments

Laura L. Van Eerd, Zhenhong Hu, Z. Wang, Jinsong Huang, Zhiming Qi, Weiting Ding, Francis Zvomuya, Hailong He, Chunmiao Zheng, Liangjie Sun
article en

Abstract

• Overall, agricultural practices reduced SIC stock but increased SOC and TC stocks. • MF and SR reduced SIC stock, especially under low MAT and high MAP conditions. • OMF vs . NF achieved the optimal balance between SIC stock and crop yield. • Soil depth, nitrogen fertilizer, and duration were key factors affecting SIC stock. • SIC stock varied regionally: increasing in the NWC and decreasing in the NEC and EC. Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is a crucial component of soil carbon pool, impacting climate change and ecosystem functions. SIC is affected by drastic changes in agricultural practices, while its response remains uncertain. We synthesized 54 field studies in China to assess the impact of agricultural practices on soil carbon stock, focusing on SIC and its responses to environmental factors. Overall, agricultural practices significantly reduced SIC stock (3.37 %) while increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stock (15.41 %) and total carbon stock (6.80 %). Carbon pool changes could be categorized as follows: synergistic increases in SIC and SOC; trade-offs between SOC increases and SIC decreases; and individual effects on either SOC or SIC. SIC varied significantly across practices and regions, driven by climate, field management, and soil properties. Mineral fertilizer and straw return caused SIC losses, particularly under low-temperatures (MAT < 10 ℃), high-rainfall (MAP > 400 mm), and after 30 years. Severe SIC losses were observed in Northeast and East China. Combining organic and mineral fertilizers optimized the balance between SIC and crop yield, especially in arid regions. Key factors affecting SIC stock included soil depth, nitrogen addition, and experimental duration. Furthermore, our meta -analysis revealed that the distinct responses of SIC and SOC to agricultural practices underscored the necessity of integrated management strategies that effectively balanced SOC sequestration with SIC conservation. This study enhances understanding of SIC cycle and provides scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural practices.

GeodermaVol. 462
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), University of Manitoba (CA), University of Guelph (CA), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.