Assessing Implant Stability in Cementless Femoral Components With Different Interference Fits

Cementless total knee arthroplasty implants offer advantages over cemented implants, such as bone preservation and easier revision procedures. However, the optimal interference fit required to achieve a good press-fit fixation, essential for both primary and long-term stability, remains uncertain. This study uses finite element analysis to investigate the effects of two interference fits (350 µm and 700 µm) on micromotions, gap behavior, and plastic deformation at the bone-implant interface of a cementless femoral component under various loading conditions. Finite element models were developed using paired cadaveric femurs, incorporating microCT and optical scans. Micromotions were quantified as shear displacement, while gaps were quantified as normal displacement. Bone response was assessed by quantifying the volume of bone experiencing total equivalent plastic strain. The models showed moderate correlation with experimental results, predicting 35% of displacement variability. Although high interference fit implants slightly reduced micromotions and gaps, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.252 and p = 0.759, respectively). The high interference fit implants exhibited significantly greater plastic deformation (+15.7%, p = 0.031), particularly at the posterior femoral condyles. These findings suggest that while an increased interference fit does not enhance primary stability, it may lead to more plasticity in the bone, potentially leading to more damage. Thus, optimizing the interference fit is crucial to balance implant fixation and minimize bone damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70079
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Implant Stability in Cementless Femoral Components With Different Interference Fits

Christoph Schilling, Dennis Janssen, Esther Sánchez, Thomas M. Grupp et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Assessing Implant Stability in Cementless Femoral Components With Different Interference Fits

Christoph Schilling, Dennis Janssen, Esther Sánchez, Thomas M. Grupp, Nico Verdonschot, Alexander Giurea
article en

Abstract

Cementless total knee arthroplasty implants offer advantages over cemented implants, such as bone preservation and easier revision procedures. However, the optimal interference fit required to achieve a good press-fit fixation, essential for both primary and long-term stability, remains uncertain. This study uses finite element analysis to investigate the effects of two interference fits (350 µm and 700 µm) on micromotions, gap behavior, and plastic deformation at the bone-implant interface of a cementless femoral component under various loading conditions. Finite element models were developed using paired cadaveric femurs, incorporating microCT and optical scans. Micromotions were quantified as shear displacement, while gaps were quantified as normal displacement. Bone response was assessed by quantifying the volume of bone experiencing total equivalent plastic strain. The models showed moderate correlation with experimental results, predicting 35% of displacement variability. Although high interference fit implants slightly reduced micromotions and gaps, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.252 and p = 0.759, respectively). The high interference fit implants exhibited significantly greater plastic deformation (+15.7%, p = 0.031), particularly at the posterior femoral condyles. These findings suggest that while an increased interference fit does not enhance primary stability, it may lead to more plasticity in the bone, potentially leading to more damage. Thus, optimizing the interference fit is crucial to balance implant fixation and minimize bone damage.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 44(2)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Aesculap (United States) (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.