Fortifying Servant Leadership’s Foundations: Five Core Questions to Guide Future Research

Servant leadership research is rapidly accumulating, but the degree to which it advances the broader leadership literature with novel insights remains a contentious point of debate. Skeptics argue that the validity of servant leadership’s theoretical foundation and its empirical measures are questionable. Supporters, however, point to servant leadership’s unique focus on service to multiple stakeholders as well as meta-analyses supporting its incremental predictive validity relative to other moral and inspirational leadership approaches as evidence of its novelty in the leadership domain. These two camps seldom engage in constructive dialogue to advance the field in a purposeful, productive, and practical way. The purpose of this editorial is a twofold approach to bridge this gap. First, we introduce a servant leadership special issue in Group and Organization Management ( GOM ) that brings together emerging and established scholars, as well as a seasoned practitioner, to address shortcomings in extant servant leadership scholarship and articulate new ideas that promise to usher the literature into a new era of insights. Second, we discuss five core questions to fortify the foundations of servant leadership research. These questions pertain to servant leadership’s nomological network, empirical and theoretical overlap with other leadership constructs, theoretical boundaries, dimensionality, and empirical validity. We hope this GOM special issue and editorial paint a constructive and promising path forward for the next era of servant leadership research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251376461
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fortifying Servant Leadership’s Foundations: Five Core Questions to Guide Future Research

Jeremy D. Meuser, Jarvis Smallfield, Nathan Eva, G. James Lemoine et al.
2 citations
Group & Organization Management
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
4.88
article

Fortifying Servant Leadership’s Foundations: Five Core Questions to Guide Future Research

Jeremy D. Meuser, Jarvis Smallfield, Nathan Eva, G. James Lemoine, Chad A. Hartnell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Servant leadership research is rapidly accumulating, but the degree to which it advances the broader leadership literature with novel insights remains a contentious point of debate. Skeptics argue that the validity of servant leadership’s theoretical foundation and its empirical measures are questionable. Supporters, however, point to servant leadership’s unique focus on service to multiple stakeholders as well as meta-analyses supporting its incremental predictive validity relative to other moral and inspirational leadership approaches as evidence of its novelty in the leadership domain. These two camps seldom engage in constructive dialogue to advance the field in a purposeful, productive, and practical way. The purpose of this editorial is a twofold approach to bridge this gap. First, we introduce a servant leadership special issue in Group and Organization Management ( GOM ) that brings together emerging and established scholars, as well as a seasoned practitioner, to address shortcomings in extant servant leadership scholarship and articulate new ideas that promise to usher the literature into a new era of insights. Second, we discuss five core questions to fortify the foundations of servant leadership research. These questions pertain to servant leadership’s nomological network, empirical and theoretical overlap with other leadership constructs, theoretical boundaries, dimensionality, and empirical validity. We hope this GOM special issue and editorial paint a constructive and promising path forward for the next era of servant leadership research and practice.

Group & Organization Management
Central Michigan University (US), Georgia State University (US), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.