Justice between the Ethics and the Politics: the Origin of the First Common Book of Aristotle’s Ethics

Abstract This article investigates the development of Aristotle’s theory of justice through a comparative analysis of Book v of the Nicomachean Ethics and key passages from the Politics . While the so-called “common books” ( ne v – vii = ee iv – vi ) have long been a subject of scholarly debate regarding their original attribution, recent studies by Dorothea Frede and Mi-Kyoung Lee suggest that first common book fits more naturally within the theoretical framework of the Nicomachean Ethics than the Eudemian Ethics . Building on their insights, this article seeks to clarify why Aristotle revised and expanded his account of justice in the form preserved in the Nicomachean Ethics . The analysis unfolds as follows: first, it shows that in the Politics justice is tied to the notion of the common good, serving as a criterion for evaluating political regimes; second, it explores how Aristotle grounds justice in law and equality within the Politics , while also noting unresolved tensions; third, it compares these findings with Book v of the Nicomachean Ethics , where Aristotle addresses these tensions by offering a more systematic rigorous account of justice as both lawfulness and equality. The article argues that this revision reflects Aristotle’s effort to integrate justice more thoroughly into his ethical theory and to respond to conceptual challenges that remained implicit in Politics .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Méthexis
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-37020005
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice between the Ethics and the Politics: the Origin of the First Common Book of Aristotle’s Ethics

Francesca Masi
Méthexis
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Justice between the Ethics and the Politics: the Origin of the First Common Book of Aristotle’s Ethics

Francesca Masi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the development of Aristotle’s theory of justice through a comparative analysis of Book v of the Nicomachean Ethics and key passages from the Politics . While the so-called “common books” ( ne v – vii = ee iv – vi ) have long been a subject of scholarly debate regarding their original attribution, recent studies by Dorothea Frede and Mi-Kyoung Lee suggest that first common book fits more naturally within the theoretical framework of the Nicomachean Ethics than the Eudemian Ethics . Building on their insights, this article seeks to clarify why Aristotle revised and expanded his account of justice in the form preserved in the Nicomachean Ethics . The analysis unfolds as follows: first, it shows that in the Politics justice is tied to the notion of the common good, serving as a criterion for evaluating political regimes; second, it explores how Aristotle grounds justice in law and equality within the Politics , while also noting unresolved tensions; third, it compares these findings with Book v of the Nicomachean Ethics , where Aristotle addresses these tensions by offering a more systematic rigorous account of justice as both lawfulness and equality. The article argues that this revision reflects Aristotle’s effort to integrate justice more thoroughly into his ethical theory and to respond to conceptual challenges that remained implicit in Politics .

MéthexisVol. 37(2)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.