Beneficios de la cirugía laparoscópica versus la cirugía abierta en la calidad de vida postoperatoria de pacientes con hernia inguinal: una revisión sistemática

Inguinal hernia is a highly prevalent surgical condition worldwide, the management of which has evolved toward minimally invasive techniques. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence (2020–2025) comparing laparoscopic (TAPP/TEP) versus open surgery, with emphasis on postoperative quality of life. Results demonstrate that the laparoscopic approach offers significant advantages: it reduces chronic pain (RR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15–0.81), accelerates return to work, and improves validated quality-of-life scores (EuraHS-QoL). No differences were found in recurrence rates when mesh is used. The choice of technique should be individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia type, surgical experience, and institutional context. Laparoscopy emerges as a superior option in functional recovery without compromising long-term efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71112/1ptym831
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beneficios de la cirugía laparoscópica versus la cirugía abierta en la calidad de vida postoperatoria de pacientes con hernia inguinal: una revisión sistemática

Raúl Zacarias Palacios Soria, E. Ortega, Alberto López Menchero Mora, L Moreno et al.
Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
Hernia repair and management
article

Beneficios de la cirugía laparoscópica versus la cirugía abierta en la calidad de vida postoperatoria de pacientes con hernia inguinal: una revisión sistemática

Raúl Zacarias Palacios Soria, E. Ortega, Alberto López Menchero Mora, L Moreno, Bryan Iván Junco Vera
article en

Abstract

Inguinal hernia is a highly prevalent surgical condition worldwide, the management of which has evolved toward minimally invasive techniques. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence (2020–2025) comparing laparoscopic (TAPP/TEP) versus open surgery, with emphasis on postoperative quality of life. Results demonstrate that the laparoscopic approach offers significant advantages: it reduces chronic pain (RR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15–0.81), accelerates return to work, and improves validated quality-of-life scores (EuraHS-QoL). No differences were found in recurrence rates when mesh is used. The choice of technique should be individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia type, surgical experience, and institutional context. Laparoscopy emerges as a superior option in functional recovery without compromising long-term efficacy.

Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las CienciasVol. 2(4)
University of Guayaquil (EC), Junta de Beneficencia de Guayaquil
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beneficios de la cirugía laparoscópica versus la cirugía abierta en la calidad de vida postoperatoria de pacientes con hernia inguinal: una revisión sistemática — Raúl Zacarias Palacios Soria, E. Ortega, et al. · Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS