Figure 5 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

<p>Exploratory evaluation of the utility of the 95% CI RR for late-stage incidence as a “forecast” of the final trial result for cancer-specific mortality. <b>A,</b> The observed RR for mortality (point estimates) versus the “predicted” 95% CI for the RR based on the observed incidence of late-stage cancer in the intervention versus the control arm. <b>B,</b> The data from <b>A</b> are transformed so that observed – predicted mortality is shown by trial, ordered by where on the prediction the observed mortality fell (mortality at top end of range at top and bottom end of range at bottom of the plot). Estimates marked red are from trials in which the observed mortality exceeds predicted range based on the late-stage outcome; those marked green are trials in which the observed mortality is lower than predicted; and observed mortality RR was included within the 95% CI range of the late-stage outcome for all the other trials shown in black. Wide confidence intervals are due to inclusion of smaller trials.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.30271532
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figure 5 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Robert Allen Smith, Julia Geppert, Peter David Sasieni, Chris Stinton et al.
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Figure 5 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Robert Allen Smith, Julia Geppert, Peter David Sasieni, Chris Stinton, Matejka Rebolj, Stephen William Duffy, Bethany Shinkins, Ruth Etzioni, Sam M. Janes, Samantha Johnson, Matthew J. Randell, Sian Taylor‐Phillips, Adam R. Brentnall, Karoline Freeman, Nefeli Kouppa
article en

Abstract

<p>Exploratory evaluation of the utility of the 95% CI RR for late-stage incidence as a “forecast” of the final trial result for cancer-specific mortality. <b>A,</b> The observed RR for mortality (point estimates) versus the “predicted” 95% CI for the RR based on the observed incidence of late-stage cancer in the intervention versus the control arm. <b>B,</b> The data from <b>A</b> are transformed so that observed – predicted mortality is shown by trial, ordered by where on the prediction the observed mortality fell (mortality at top end of range at top and bottom end of range at bottom of the plot). Estimates marked red are from trials in which the observed mortality exceeds predicted range based on the late-stage outcome; those marked green are trials in which the observed mortality is lower than predicted; and observed mortality RR was included within the 95% CI range of the late-stage outcome for all the other trials shown in black. Wide confidence intervals are due to inclusion of smaller trials.</p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.