Figure 2 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

<p>Bubble plots to evaluate the strength of association between the trial-level effect of screening on cancer mortality and the effect on either incidence of late-stage cancer or the proportion of cancers that are late stage across all trials. These are the primary results from the meta-analysis. <b>A,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. <b>B,</b> Proportion of cancers diagnosed at late stage. Each data point in <b>A</b> and <b>B</b> is a trial arm comparison. <b>C,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. <b>D,</b> Proportion of cancers diagnosed at late stage. Each data point in <b>C</b> and <b>D</b> is from a class of screening test. The same type of plot is used for <b>A</b><b>–</b><b>D</b>. <b>E,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. The scales (1-RR) from <b>C</b> are inverted and SEs are added to better show uncertainty. <b>F,</b> Associated <i>z</i>-statistics from <b>E</b>. Each data point in <b>E</b> and <b>F</b> is from a class of screening test. In all plots, the bubble sizes are proportional to the inverse variance of the screening effect on the mortality outcome. a, the intercept from the regression analysis; b, the regression coefficient from the regression analysis; ρ, the estimated correlation coefficients. Dotted lines: axes of no screening effect on late-stage and mortality outcomes. Dashed line: diagonal of equal screening effect on late-stage and mortality outcomes. FOBT, fecal occult blood test; FS/C, flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy; LDCT, low-dose CT.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.30271544
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figure 2 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Robert Allen Smith, Julia Geppert, Peter David Sasieni, Chris Stinton et al.
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Figure 2 from Late-Stage Outcomes as Surrogates for Mortality in Cancer Screening Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Robert Allen Smith, Julia Geppert, Peter David Sasieni, Chris Stinton, Matejka Rebolj, Stephen William Duffy, Bethany Shinkins, Ruth Etzioni, Sam M. Janes, Samantha Johnson, Matthew J. Randell, Sian Taylor‐Phillips, Adam R. Brentnall, Karoline Freeman, Nefeli Kouppa
article en

Abstract

<p>Bubble plots to evaluate the strength of association between the trial-level effect of screening on cancer mortality and the effect on either incidence of late-stage cancer or the proportion of cancers that are late stage across all trials. These are the primary results from the meta-analysis. <b>A,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. <b>B,</b> Proportion of cancers diagnosed at late stage. Each data point in <b>A</b> and <b>B</b> is a trial arm comparison. <b>C,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. <b>D,</b> Proportion of cancers diagnosed at late stage. Each data point in <b>C</b> and <b>D</b> is from a class of screening test. The same type of plot is used for <b>A</b><b>–</b><b>D</b>. <b>E,</b> Incidence of late-stage cancer. The scales (1-RR) from <b>C</b> are inverted and SEs are added to better show uncertainty. <b>F,</b> Associated <i>z</i>-statistics from <b>E</b>. Each data point in <b>E</b> and <b>F</b> is from a class of screening test. In all plots, the bubble sizes are proportional to the inverse variance of the screening effect on the mortality outcome. a, the intercept from the regression analysis; b, the regression coefficient from the regression analysis; ρ, the estimated correlation coefficients. Dotted lines: axes of no screening effect on late-stage and mortality outcomes. Dashed line: diagonal of equal screening effect on late-stage and mortality outcomes. FOBT, fecal occult blood test; FS/C, flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy; LDCT, low-dose CT.</p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.