Data from It Is a Good Idea, but Are They Willing? Assessing Pharmacist Willingness to Deliver Colorectal Cancer Screening

<div>AbstractBackground:<p>Accessibility, expanding scope of practice, and a rapidly changing policy landscape make US community pharmacies a promising delivery setting for colorectal cancer screening. It is not clear, however, whether community pharmacists are willing to incorporate colorectal cancer screening into their pharmacy practice, what potential drivers of willingness are, and, if unwilling, under what conditions pharmacists would be willing to provide PharmFIT.</p>Methods:<p>From September 2022 to January 2023, we surveyed 578 currently practicing community pharmacists. We assessed willingness to provide a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program (PharmFIT). We used multiple linear regression to identify correlates of perceived implementation complexity and multiple logistic regression to explore overall willingness to implement PharmFIT.</p>Results:<p>Most pharmacists (80%) were willing to implement PharmFIT. The most common reasons for unwillingness were that results needed to be reported to the patients’ primary care providers (52%), that appropriate training in delivering colorectal cancer screening be provided (48%), and that care coordination with primary care providers be clear (46%). Perceived complexity of the intervention decreased as years in practice increased [<i>β</i> = 0.013; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01–0.02] and as the level of knowledge about colorectal cancer screening increased (<i>β</i> = 0.085; 95% CI, 0.01–0.16). Respondents’ willingness to implement PharmFIT increased as perceived complexity decreased (OR = 5.68; 95% CI, 3.96–8.15).</p>Conclusions:<p>Most community pharmacists in the United States would be willing to integrate PharmFIT into their current workflows. Training in how to deliver fecal immunochemical testing and preparation for the coordination of test results and follow-up care should be completed prior to implementing PharmFIT.</p>Impact:<p>Community pharmacies are a viable venue for delivering colorectal cancer screening.</p></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.c.8069373
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data from It Is a Good Idea, but Are They Willing? Assessing Pharmacist Willingness to Deliver Colorectal Cancer Screening

Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi, Renée M. Ferrari, Macary Weck Marciniak, Parth D. Shah et al.
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Data from It Is a Good Idea, but Are They Willing? Assessing Pharmacist Willingness to Deliver Colorectal Cancer Screening

Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi, Renée M. Ferrari, Macary Weck Marciniak, Parth D. Shah, Mary Wangen, Austin R. Waters, Stephanie B. Wheeler, Alison T. Brenner
article en

Abstract

<div>AbstractBackground:<p>Accessibility, expanding scope of practice, and a rapidly changing policy landscape make US community pharmacies a promising delivery setting for colorectal cancer screening. It is not clear, however, whether community pharmacists are willing to incorporate colorectal cancer screening into their pharmacy practice, what potential drivers of willingness are, and, if unwilling, under what conditions pharmacists would be willing to provide PharmFIT.</p>Methods:<p>From September 2022 to January 2023, we surveyed 578 currently practicing community pharmacists. We assessed willingness to provide a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program (PharmFIT). We used multiple linear regression to identify correlates of perceived implementation complexity and multiple logistic regression to explore overall willingness to implement PharmFIT.</p>Results:<p>Most pharmacists (80%) were willing to implement PharmFIT. The most common reasons for unwillingness were that results needed to be reported to the patients’ primary care providers (52%), that appropriate training in delivering colorectal cancer screening be provided (48%), and that care coordination with primary care providers be clear (46%). Perceived complexity of the intervention decreased as years in practice increased [<i>β</i> = 0.013; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01–0.02] and as the level of knowledge about colorectal cancer screening increased (<i>β</i> = 0.085; 95% CI, 0.01–0.16). Respondents’ willingness to implement PharmFIT increased as perceived complexity decreased (OR = 5.68; 95% CI, 3.96–8.15).</p>Conclusions:<p>Most community pharmacists in the United States would be willing to integrate PharmFIT into their current workflows. Training in how to deliver fecal immunochemical testing and preparation for the coordination of test results and follow-up care should be completed prior to implementing PharmFIT.</p>Impact:<p>Community pharmacies are a viable venue for delivering colorectal cancer screening.</p></div>

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.