The <scp>RNA</scp> ‐Puzzles Assessments of <scp>RNA</scp> ‐Only Targets in <scp>CASP16</scp>

RNA-Puzzles was launched in 2011 as a collaborative effort dedicated to advancing and improving RNA 3D structure prediction. The automatic evaluation protocols for comparisons between prediction and experiment developed within RNA-Puzzles are applied to the 2024 CASP16 competition. The scores evaluate stereochemical parameters, Watson-Crick pairs, non-Watson-Crick pairs, and base stacking in addition to standard global parameters such as RMSD, TM-score, GDT, or lDDT. Several targets were particularly difficult owing to their size or multimerization. As noted in previous evaluations, although predictions that perform well on secondary structure may also achieve acceptable overall folds, they are insufficient to guarantee chemical precision or to correctly identify residues involved in non-Watson-Crick interactions. Both are essential for obtaining a valid three-dimensional architecture and for understanding the biological function of RNAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70052
Citations
6
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The RNA ‐Puzzles Assessments of RNA ‐Only Targets in CASP16

Hao Sun, Éric Westhof, Zhichao Miao, Fan Bu
6 citations
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
4.84
article

The RNA ‐Puzzles Assessments of RNA ‐Only Targets in CASP16

Hao Sun, Éric Westhof, Zhichao Miao, Fan Bu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

RNA-Puzzles was launched in 2011 as a collaborative effort dedicated to advancing and improving RNA 3D structure prediction. The automatic evaluation protocols for comparisons between prediction and experiment developed within RNA-Puzzles are applied to the 2024 CASP16 competition. The scores evaluate stereochemical parameters, Watson-Crick pairs, non-Watson-Crick pairs, and base stacking in addition to standard global parameters such as RMSD, TM-score, GDT, or lDDT. Several targets were particularly difficult owing to their size or multimerization. As noted in previous evaluations, although predictions that perform well on secondary structure may also achieve acceptable overall folds, they are insufficient to guarantee chemical precision or to correctly identify residues involved in non-Watson-Crick interactions. Both are essential for obtaining a valid three-dimensional architecture and for understanding the biological function of RNAs.

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsVol. 94(1)
Tongji University (CN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Wenzhou University (CN), Architecture et Réactivité de l'arN (FR), Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.