Self‐Respect and Justice

ABSTRACT What is self‐respect? And how can it bear the normative weight that liberal egalitarians often place on it within their theories of justice? This paper aims to answer these questions. I argue that appraisal self‐respect does not entail sufficient recognition self‐respect from the viewpoint of justice. Then, after noting that recognition self‐respect is often appealed to by activists and theorists participating in real‐world egalitarian movements, I argue that it is the value of recognition self‐respect—as opposed to appraisal self‐respect—that supports an egalitarian picture of political morality. I argue that Rawlsian recognition self‐respect can play this role and that its social bases constitute a social primary good. I conclude by replying to the objections that the social bases of self‐respect are not distribuenda, that considering these social bases to be a social primary good constitutes unacceptable double‐counting, that the social bases of self‐respect cannot explain the content of justice, and that individuals are fully responsible for developing their self‐respect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.70066
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self‐Respect and Justice

Anthony Nguyen
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Self‐Respect and Justice

Anthony Nguyen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT What is self‐respect? And how can it bear the normative weight that liberal egalitarians often place on it within their theories of justice? This paper aims to answer these questions. I argue that appraisal self‐respect does not entail sufficient recognition self‐respect from the viewpoint of justice. Then, after noting that recognition self‐respect is often appealed to by activists and theorists participating in real‐world egalitarian movements, I argue that it is the value of recognition self‐respect—as opposed to appraisal self‐respect—that supports an egalitarian picture of political morality. I argue that Rawlsian recognition self‐respect can play this role and that its social bases constitute a social primary good. I conclude by replying to the objections that the social bases of self‐respect are not distribuenda, that considering these social bases to be a social primary good constitutes unacceptable double‐counting, that the social bases of self‐respect cannot explain the content of justice, and that individuals are fully responsible for developing their self‐respect.

Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchVol. 112(1)
Florida State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self‐Respect and Justice — Anthony Nguyen · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS