Normative credences are not classical

Abstract I present an argument that the information-sensitivity of normative contents entails that normative credences are not classical and draw some consequences for the debate on normative uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analysis
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaf053
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative credences are not classical

Fabrizio Cariani
Analysis
Ethics in medical practice
article

Normative credences are not classical

Fabrizio Cariani
article en

Abstract

Abstract I present an argument that the information-sensitivity of normative contents entails that normative credences are not classical and draw some consequences for the debate on normative uncertainty.

Analysis
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics in medical practice
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Normative credences are not classical — Fabrizio Cariani · Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS