P003 Can the electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power predict mean sleep latency?

Abstract Introduction A Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is resource intensive. An alternative, simpler method would be valuable. This study evaluates whether EEG total alpha power (TAP) from the 20-second eyes-closed calibration exercise conducted at the start of nap 1 of the MSLT can predict mean sleep latency (MSL). Method We retrospectively analyzed 400 consecutive polysomnography (PSG) and Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) reports and raw data from studies conducted at an Australian tertiary hospital adult sleep laboratory from January 2022 to February 2025. We excluded 156 reports due to an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) greater than 15, a Total Sleep Time of less than 6 hours, and Sleep Efficiency of less than 75%. Additionally, 37 MSLT raw data were excluded due to poor EEG quality. We collected data on the Arousal Index and medications for further analysis. We compared TAP values from 4 EEG signals (O1, O2, F3, F4) during the 20-second eyes-closed maneuver in nap 1 with the MSL using a one-way ANOVA. We averaged the TAP values from the same sites (occipital and frontal) and grouped them into three categories: low power (less than 20 μV2), medium power (20 to 40 μV2), and high power (greater than 40 μV2) before comparing them with MSL using a one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis. Results We found a correlation between MSL and F3-TAP (p=.015). There was no significant difference in the average MSL among the three groups for F-TAP (p=.26) and O-TAP (p=.62), but we saw an increasing mean average MSL in the three groups of F-TAP and O-TAP. Low F-TAP: 8.35 (SD 4.62), medium F-TAP: 8.62 (SD 5.09) and high F-TAP: 9.76 (SD 5.13). Low O-TAP: 8.21 (SD 4.64), medium O-TAP: 8.94 (SD 5.03) and high O-TAP: 8.99 (SD 5.00). Conclusion We observed some evidence that higher alpha power from the frontal lobe may be associated with increased sleep latency, though more data and further examination of the impact of various medications and arousal index is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP Advances
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf053.063
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P003 Can the electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power predict mean sleep latency?

Stephen Gyulay, Bronwyn K. Brew, J Eritaia, V George et al.
SLEEP Advances
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

P003 Can the electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power predict mean sleep latency?

Stephen Gyulay, Bronwyn K. Brew, J Eritaia, V George, S Pradeepan, D Pazeski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction A Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is resource intensive. An alternative, simpler method would be valuable. This study evaluates whether EEG total alpha power (TAP) from the 20-second eyes-closed calibration exercise conducted at the start of nap 1 of the MSLT can predict mean sleep latency (MSL). Method We retrospectively analyzed 400 consecutive polysomnography (PSG) and Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) reports and raw data from studies conducted at an Australian tertiary hospital adult sleep laboratory from January 2022 to February 2025. We excluded 156 reports due to an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) greater than 15, a Total Sleep Time of less than 6 hours, and Sleep Efficiency of less than 75%. Additionally, 37 MSLT raw data were excluded due to poor EEG quality. We collected data on the Arousal Index and medications for further analysis. We compared TAP values from 4 EEG signals (O1, O2, F3, F4) during the 20-second eyes-closed maneuver in nap 1 with the MSL using a one-way ANOVA. We averaged the TAP values from the same sites (occipital and frontal) and grouped them into three categories: low power (less than 20 μV2), medium power (20 to 40 μV2), and high power (greater than 40 μV2) before comparing them with MSL using a one-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis. Results We found a correlation between MSL and F3-TAP (p=.015). There was no significant difference in the average MSL among the three groups for F-TAP (p=.26) and O-TAP (p=.62), but we saw an increasing mean average MSL in the three groups of F-TAP and O-TAP. Low F-TAP: 8.35 (SD 4.62), medium F-TAP: 8.62 (SD 5.09) and high F-TAP: 9.76 (SD 5.13). Low O-TAP: 8.21 (SD 4.64), medium O-TAP: 8.94 (SD 5.03) and high O-TAP: 8.99 (SD 5.00). Conclusion We observed some evidence that higher alpha power from the frontal lobe may be associated with increased sleep latency, though more data and further examination of the impact of various medications and arousal index is required.

SLEEP AdvancesVol. 6(Supplement_1)
John Hunter Hospital (AU), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.