O031 How many nights? Examining the reliability of sleep intraindividual variability

Abstract Introduction Individual sleep–wake patterns are characterized by the intraindividual mean and variability, which captures night-to-night fluctuations. Although research has focused on mean sleep parameters, higher sleep duration and timing variability are associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes. Most accelerometry-based sleep studies assess 5-14 nights, which may be insufficient for reliable variability estimates. This study quantifies how many nights are needed for reliable sleep intraindividual mean and variability estimates. Methods Participants (n = 10 412, M-age = 37.75 ± 10.65, 50% women) wore a validated biometric device for 1-year (3 700 492 person-nights). Total sleep time (TST), sleep onset, mid-sleep, sleep offset, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep percentage were derived from heart rate and accelerometer data. Reference intraindividual means (iM) and standard deviations (iSD) were calculated from all (363) nights. Reliability correlation coefficients compared reference values with 2-362 consecutive nights randomly selected per participant, with r ≥ .80 considered reliable. Results Reliable estimates of sleep iM required 2-8 nights (TST = 8 nights; sleep timing = 2 nights; WASO and sleep percentage = 4 nights). Reliable iSD estimates required substantially longer durations, 41-67 nights (TST = 43 nights; sleep timing = 41 nights; WASO and sleep percentage = 67 nights). iSDs from 7- or 14-nights showed poor reliability (r7-Nights = .48–.57; r14-Nights = .59–.68). Discussion Eight nights of accelerometry data are sufficient to estimate intraindividual mean sleep, but 41-67 nights are needed to reliably estimate intraindividual sleep variability. Findings highlight the importance of tailoring study periods to the sleep metric of interest. Longer monitoring periods may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform recommendations for sleep assessments in clinical and research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP Advances
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf053.031
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O031 How many nights? Examining the reliability of sleep intraindividual variability

Joshua F. Wiley, Summer R. Jasinski, Elise R. Facer‐Childs, Josh Leota et al.
SLEEP Advances
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

O031 How many nights? Examining the reliability of sleep intraindividual variability

Joshua F. Wiley, Summer R. Jasinski, Elise R. Facer‐Childs, Josh Leota, Emily R. Capodilupo, Brett Messman, Flora Le
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Individual sleep–wake patterns are characterized by the intraindividual mean and variability, which captures night-to-night fluctuations. Although research has focused on mean sleep parameters, higher sleep duration and timing variability are associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes. Most accelerometry-based sleep studies assess 5-14 nights, which may be insufficient for reliable variability estimates. This study quantifies how many nights are needed for reliable sleep intraindividual mean and variability estimates. Methods Participants (n = 10 412, M-age = 37.75 ± 10.65, 50% women) wore a validated biometric device for 1-year (3 700 492 person-nights). Total sleep time (TST), sleep onset, mid-sleep, sleep offset, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep percentage were derived from heart rate and accelerometer data. Reference intraindividual means (iM) and standard deviations (iSD) were calculated from all (363) nights. Reliability correlation coefficients compared reference values with 2-362 consecutive nights randomly selected per participant, with r ≥ .80 considered reliable. Results Reliable estimates of sleep iM required 2-8 nights (TST = 8 nights; sleep timing = 2 nights; WASO and sleep percentage = 4 nights). Reliable iSD estimates required substantially longer durations, 41-67 nights (TST = 43 nights; sleep timing = 41 nights; WASO and sleep percentage = 67 nights). iSDs from 7- or 14-nights showed poor reliability (r7-Nights = .48–.57; r14-Nights = .59–.68). Discussion Eight nights of accelerometry data are sufficient to estimate intraindividual mean sleep, but 41-67 nights are needed to reliably estimate intraindividual sleep variability. Findings highlight the importance of tailoring study periods to the sleep metric of interest. Longer monitoring periods may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform recommendations for sleep assessments in clinical and research settings.

SLEEP AdvancesVol. 6(Supplement_1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Wheelock College (US), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.