MAXIMUM BITE FORCE IN FIXED PRELIMINARY PROSTHETICS

Background: Maximum bite force is the maximum force that a pаtient can reproduce without causing periodontal pain in teeth. The study aimed to clinically investigate the maximum bite force in patients prosthetized with test specimens of preliminary constructions (with/without reinforcement) and derive recommendations for practice. Methods: A total of 30 patients (18 males and 12 females), aged between 45 and 59 years, with distal partially edentulous conditions, were treated with preliminary constructions (PCs) at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia. For the study of each patient, four identically shaped bridge constructions from different materials were fabricated in the laboratory: a metal-ceramic bridge; a subtractive PMMA bridge; an additive solid bridge; additive bridge with reinforcement. The study of the maximum bite force for the different constructions was carried out using a universal gnathodynamometric system. Results: The Friedman test revealed a statistically significant relationship between the maximum bite force and the type of preliminary construction, p < 0.001. The subsequent post-hoc pairwise analysis provided clarifying data on the differences between the types of constructions, as follows: The metal-ceramic construction demonstrates a significantly higher maximum bite force (median median 117 N) compared to the other constructions: printed-reinforced (median median 105 N; p = 0.001); printed (median median 77 N; p < 0.001); and milled (median 86 N; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Since metal-ceramic frameworks are inherently permanent prosthetic constructions, the scientific focus of our study is on the other three groups of preliminary constructions, each of which may be the object of choice in long-term preliminary prosthetics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2025314.6497
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MAXIMUM BITE FORCE IN FIXED PRELIMINARY PROSTHETICS

Stefan Rangelov, Мariana Dimova-Gabrovska
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

MAXIMUM BITE FORCE IN FIXED PRELIMINARY PROSTHETICS

Stefan Rangelov, Мariana Dimova-Gabrovska
article en

Abstract

Background: Maximum bite force is the maximum force that a pаtient can reproduce without causing periodontal pain in teeth. The study aimed to clinically investigate the maximum bite force in patients prosthetized with test specimens of preliminary constructions (with/without reinforcement) and derive recommendations for practice. Methods: A total of 30 patients (18 males and 12 females), aged between 45 and 59 years, with distal partially edentulous conditions, were treated with preliminary constructions (PCs) at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University – Sofia. For the study of each patient, four identically shaped bridge constructions from different materials were fabricated in the laboratory: a metal-ceramic bridge; a subtractive PMMA bridge; an additive solid bridge; additive bridge with reinforcement. The study of the maximum bite force for the different constructions was carried out using a universal gnathodynamometric system. Results: The Friedman test revealed a statistically significant relationship between the maximum bite force and the type of preliminary construction, p < 0.001. The subsequent post-hoc pairwise analysis provided clarifying data on the differences between the types of constructions, as follows: The metal-ceramic construction demonstrates a significantly higher maximum bite force (median median 117 N) compared to the other constructions: printed-reinforced (median median 105 N; p = 0.001); printed (median median 77 N; p < 0.001); and milled (median 86 N; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Since metal-ceramic frameworks are inherently permanent prosthetic constructions, the scientific focus of our study is on the other three groups of preliminary constructions, each of which may be the object of choice in long-term preliminary prosthetics.

Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)Vol. 31(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MAXIMUM BITE FORCE IN FIXED PRELIMINARY PROSTHETICS — Stefan Rangelov, Мariana Dimova-Gabrovska · Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS