ПРОБЛЕМА КОМПЛЕКСНОСТІ У КРИМІНОЛОГІЇ: АНАЛІЗ МИНУЛОГО, ОЦІНКА ТЕПЕРІШНЬОГО, ПОГЛЯД У МАЙБУТНЄ

This article, based on the results of theoretical and empirical research, attempts to evaluate the breadth and depth of understanding the issue of complexity and the comprehensive approach in the field of criminology. Arguments are presented regarding the appropriateness of studying the state of scientific development of the problem of complexity. The characteristics of an intersystem, sectoral-subject-chronological approach to understanding the announced issues are revealed. The author offers a general understanding of complexity and the comprehensive approach. Key scholars and their scientific works, which directly or mostly indirectly relate to the problem of complexity, are listed. The article outlines the four main stages in the formation and development of philosophical and criminological knowledge about complexity. Attention is drawn to the significance of general scientific systems methodology for a deeper understanding of the heuristic potential of the comprehensive approach in general and complexity in particular. The study of theoretical and methodological problems of complexity can be excluded from the implementation of the systematic scientific approach, as well as the consideration of this crisis problem through the prism of a special systemic criminological object (formation). The development of scientific knowledge about complexity and systematicity has gone through decades of conventional historical eras: the initial (Antique), middle (modern era), main (from the middle of the 20th century to the present) and modern stages. Currently, the increase in knowledge about the problem of complexity in criminology can be productive provided that the phenomenon of crime is recognized as a complex social system, which, according to the dialectical law of unity and struggle of opposites, is opposed by another, criminological, system. It consists of several interconnected complexes that closely interact with each other and are aimed at achieving a single systemic goal - the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, limiting the spread of criminal offenses and reducing their negative social consequences. The prospects for further research into the specified scientific matter have been outlined. Promising directions for increasing scientific knowledge in this area are the justification of the application of complexity at all levels of the criminological system of Ukraine in order to achieve the effectiveness of criminological doctrine, criminological legislation, criminological policy, criminology as an academic discipline, criminological worldview, and criminological activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32631/vca.2025.2.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ПРОБЛЕМА КОМПЛЕКСНОСТІ У КРИМІНОЛОГІЇ: АНАЛІЗ МИНУЛОГО, ОЦІНКА ТЕПЕРІШНЬОГО, ПОГЛЯД У МАЙБУТНЄ

М.Г. КОЛОДЯЖНИЙ
1 citations
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
8.52
article

ПРОБЛЕМА КОМПЛЕКСНОСТІ У КРИМІНОЛОГІЇ: АНАЛІЗ МИНУЛОГО, ОЦІНКА ТЕПЕРІШНЬОГО, ПОГЛЯД У МАЙБУТНЄ

М.Г. КОЛОДЯЖНИЙ
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article, based on the results of theoretical and empirical research, attempts to evaluate the breadth and depth of understanding the issue of complexity and the comprehensive approach in the field of criminology. Arguments are presented regarding the appropriateness of studying the state of scientific development of the problem of complexity. The characteristics of an intersystem, sectoral-subject-chronological approach to understanding the announced issues are revealed. The author offers a general understanding of complexity and the comprehensive approach. Key scholars and their scientific works, which directly or mostly indirectly relate to the problem of complexity, are listed. The article outlines the four main stages in the formation and development of philosophical and criminological knowledge about complexity. Attention is drawn to the significance of general scientific systems methodology for a deeper understanding of the heuristic potential of the comprehensive approach in general and complexity in particular. The study of theoretical and methodological problems of complexity can be excluded from the implementation of the systematic scientific approach, as well as the consideration of this crisis problem through the prism of a special systemic criminological object (formation). The development of scientific knowledge about complexity and systematicity has gone through decades of conventional historical eras: the initial (Antique), middle (modern era), main (from the middle of the 20th century to the present) and modern stages. Currently, the increase in knowledge about the problem of complexity in criminology can be productive provided that the phenomenon of crime is recognized as a complex social system, which, according to the dialectical law of unity and struggle of opposites, is opposed by another, criminological, system. It consists of several interconnected complexes that closely interact with each other and are aimed at achieving a single systemic goal - the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, limiting the spread of criminal offenses and reducing their negative social consequences. The prospects for further research into the specified scientific matter have been outlined. Promising directions for increasing scientific knowledge in this area are the justification of the application of complexity at all levels of the criminological system of Ukraine in order to achieve the effectiveness of criminological doctrine, criminological legislation, criminological policy, criminology as an academic discipline, criminological worldview, and criminological activity.

Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації УкраїниVol. 35(2)
Max Planck Society (DE), Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.