СУЧАСНА ПАРАДИГМА КРИМІНАЛІСТИЧНОГО ЗНАЧЕННЯ ЦИФРОВИХ СЛІДІВ У КРИМІНАЛЬНОМУ ПРОВАДЖЕННІ

The article examines the nature of digital traces as elements of the information environment created by criminal activity in the digital space. It establishes that digital traces can serve as forensically significant sources of information capable of revealing the mechanism of the crime, the identity of the offender, the circumstances of the incident, and other relevant details vital for evidence. The distinction between digital traces and traditional material carriers of trace information is clarified, particularly their instability, intangibility, susceptibility to external interference, and the difficulty of fixation. It is highlighted that these features necessitate adapting current forensic methods and developing new techniques for the fixation, verification, preservation, and evaluation of digital information as evidence. Several critical issues related to regulatory frameworks for handling digital traces in criminal proceedings are outlined, including the absence of a clear definition of electronic evidence, vague admissibility criteria, and inadequate procedural documentation of actions involving digital media. The need to unify terminology and procedures in line with international standards, especially those outlined in the Budapest Convention and the recommendations of the Council of Europe, is also emphasized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32631/vca.2025.2.16
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

СУЧАСНА ПАРАДИГМА КРИМІНАЛІСТИЧНОГО ЗНАЧЕННЯ ЦИФРОВИХ СЛІДІВ У КРИМІНАЛЬНОМУ ПРОВАДЖЕННІ

К.В. КАРАМАН
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

СУЧАСНА ПАРАДИГМА КРИМІНАЛІСТИЧНОГО ЗНАЧЕННЯ ЦИФРОВИХ СЛІДІВ У КРИМІНАЛЬНОМУ ПРОВАДЖЕННІ

К.В. КАРАМАН
article en

Abstract

The article examines the nature of digital traces as elements of the information environment created by criminal activity in the digital space. It establishes that digital traces can serve as forensically significant sources of information capable of revealing the mechanism of the crime, the identity of the offender, the circumstances of the incident, and other relevant details vital for evidence. The distinction between digital traces and traditional material carriers of trace information is clarified, particularly their instability, intangibility, susceptibility to external interference, and the difficulty of fixation. It is highlighted that these features necessitate adapting current forensic methods and developing new techniques for the fixation, verification, preservation, and evaluation of digital information as evidence. Several critical issues related to regulatory frameworks for handling digital traces in criminal proceedings are outlined, including the absence of a clear definition of electronic evidence, vague admissibility criteria, and inadequate procedural documentation of actions involving digital media. The need to unify terminology and procedures in line with international standards, especially those outlined in the Budapest Convention and the recommendations of the Council of Europe, is also emphasized.

Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації УкраїниVol. 35(2)
Weatherford College (US), Izmail State University of Humanities (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.