How two-dimensional are planet–disc interactions? I. Locally isothermal discs

ABSTRACT Planet–disc interactions, despite being fundamentally three-dimensional, are often studied in the two-dimensional ‘thin-disc’ approximation. The overall morphology of planet–disc interactions has been shown to be similar in both 2D and 3D simulations, however, the ability of a 2D simulation to quantitatively match 3D results depends strongly on how the potential of the planet is handled. Typically, the 2D planetary potential is smoothed out using some ‘smoothing length’, a free parameter, for which different values have been proposed, depending on the particular aspect of the interaction of interest. In this paper, we re-derive 2D Navier–Stokes in detail for planet–disc interactions to find better ways to represent the 2D gravitational force. We perform a large suite of 2D and 3D simulations to test these force prescriptions. We identify the parts of the interaction that are fundamentally 3D, and test how well our new force prescriptions, as well as traditional smoothed potentials, are able to match 3D simulations. Overall, we find that the optimal way to represent the planetary potential is the ‘Bessel-type potential’, but that even in this case 2D simulations are unable to reproduce the correct scaling of the total torque with background gradients, and are at best able match the one-sided Lindblad torque and gap widths to level of 10 per cent. We find that analysis of observed gap structures based on standard 2D simulations may systematically underestimate planetary masses by a factor of two, and discuss the impacts of 3D effects on observations of velocity kinks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1674
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How two-dimensional are planet–disc interactions? I. Locally isothermal discs

Roman R. Rafikov, Amelia J. Cordwell, Joshua Brown, Alexandros Ziampras
5 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
3.37
article

How two-dimensional are planet–disc interactions? I. Locally isothermal discs

Roman R. Rafikov, Amelia J. Cordwell, Joshua Brown, Alexandros Ziampras
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Planet–disc interactions, despite being fundamentally three-dimensional, are often studied in the two-dimensional ‘thin-disc’ approximation. The overall morphology of planet–disc interactions has been shown to be similar in both 2D and 3D simulations, however, the ability of a 2D simulation to quantitatively match 3D results depends strongly on how the potential of the planet is handled. Typically, the 2D planetary potential is smoothed out using some ‘smoothing length’, a free parameter, for which different values have been proposed, depending on the particular aspect of the interaction of interest. In this paper, we re-derive 2D Navier–Stokes in detail for planet–disc interactions to find better ways to represent the 2D gravitational force. We perform a large suite of 2D and 3D simulations to test these force prescriptions. We identify the parts of the interaction that are fundamentally 3D, and test how well our new force prescriptions, as well as traditional smoothed potentials, are able to match 3D simulations. Overall, we find that the optimal way to represent the planetary potential is the ‘Bessel-type potential’, but that even in this case 2D simulations are unable to reproduce the correct scaling of the total torque with background gradients, and are at best able match the one-sided Lindblad torque and gap widths to level of 10 per cent. We find that analysis of observed gap structures based on standard 2D simulations may systematically underestimate planetary masses by a factor of two, and discuss the impacts of 3D effects on observations of velocity kinks.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 543(4)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Institute for Advanced Study (US), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Cambridge Trust, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.