P15.09.A EVALUATION OF AN ART-BASED INTERVENTION IN NEURO-ONCOLOGICAL PATIENTS - A PILOT STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain tumor diagnoses often cause significant psychological distress in patients and their caregivers, frequently accompanied by neurocognitive deficits and personality changes. Art observation has been shown to positively affect neurocognition and activate brain regions involved in reflective processing, such as the Default Mode Network. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and psychosocial impact of a structured art-based intervention. METHODS In this single-center study, brain tumor patients and their relatives participated in guided art tours at a local museum. Each session centered around three themes grounded in the principles of neuroaesthetics. During the 60-minute tours, selected artworks were discussed from both a neuroscientific perspective by a neurosurgeon and an artistic perspective by an art historian. The experience was complemented by carefully chosen music that matched the themes. Vital signs were recorded before and after each session. Participants also completed a study-specific questionnaire assessing the perceived emotional and cognitive effects of the intervention, using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Additionally, validated instruments were used to measure psychological distress and health-related quality of life. The primary outcomes included feasibility, emotional responses based on questionnaire data, and changes in vital signs. RESULTS A total of 16 patients (7 male, 9 female patients) and 11 caregivers attended eight sessions between August 2023 and July 2024; additional sessions followed from March to May 2025. Overall, 25 of 27 participants (14 patients, 11 caregivers) completed the evaluation. Most reported positive experiences: 21 participants (12 patients, 9 caregivers) felt emotionally relieved; 17 (11 patients, 6 caregivers) experienced cognitive stimulation; 20 (11 patients, 9 caregivers) reported increased curiosity; and 20 (12 patients, 8 caregivers) described a positive impact on daily life. Negative responses were rare, with only 4 participants disagreeing or strongly disagreeing with feeling emotionally relieved. No adverse events occurred, and vital signs remained stable, in patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION This pilot study demonstrates that the art-based intervention is feasible and well accepted by both neuro-oncology patients and their caregivers. Preliminary results support further investigation of art observation as a complementary therapeutic approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.499
Primary Topic
Art Therapy and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P15.09.A EVALUATION OF AN ART-BASED INTERVENTION IN NEURO-ONCOLOGICAL PATIENTS - A PILOT STUDY

Mirjam Renovanz, Marcos Soares Tatagiba, Minou Nadji‐Ohl, Marcella Ziegler et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Art Therapy and Mental Health
article

P15.09.A EVALUATION OF AN ART-BASED INTERVENTION IN NEURO-ONCOLOGICAL PATIENTS - A PILOT STUDY

Mirjam Renovanz, Marcos Soares Tatagiba, Minou Nadji‐Ohl, Marcella Ziegler, Ghazaleh Tabatabai
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain tumor diagnoses often cause significant psychological distress in patients and their caregivers, frequently accompanied by neurocognitive deficits and personality changes. Art observation has been shown to positively affect neurocognition and activate brain regions involved in reflective processing, such as the Default Mode Network. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and psychosocial impact of a structured art-based intervention. METHODS In this single-center study, brain tumor patients and their relatives participated in guided art tours at a local museum. Each session centered around three themes grounded in the principles of neuroaesthetics. During the 60-minute tours, selected artworks were discussed from both a neuroscientific perspective by a neurosurgeon and an artistic perspective by an art historian. The experience was complemented by carefully chosen music that matched the themes. Vital signs were recorded before and after each session. Participants also completed a study-specific questionnaire assessing the perceived emotional and cognitive effects of the intervention, using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). Additionally, validated instruments were used to measure psychological distress and health-related quality of life. The primary outcomes included feasibility, emotional responses based on questionnaire data, and changes in vital signs. RESULTS A total of 16 patients (7 male, 9 female patients) and 11 caregivers attended eight sessions between August 2023 and July 2024; additional sessions followed from March to May 2025. Overall, 25 of 27 participants (14 patients, 11 caregivers) completed the evaluation. Most reported positive experiences: 21 participants (12 patients, 9 caregivers) felt emotionally relieved; 17 (11 patients, 6 caregivers) experienced cognitive stimulation; 20 (11 patients, 9 caregivers) reported increased curiosity; and 20 (12 patients, 8 caregivers) described a positive impact on daily life. Negative responses were rare, with only 4 participants disagreeing or strongly disagreeing with feeling emotionally relieved. No adverse events occurred, and vital signs remained stable, in patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION This pilot study demonstrates that the art-based intervention is feasible and well accepted by both neuro-oncology patients and their caregivers. Preliminary results support further investigation of art observation as a complementary therapeutic approach.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
Stuttgart Technical University of Applied Sciences (DE), Ortenau Klinikum (DE), Stuttgart Observatory (DE), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Art Therapy and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.