Shifting Racialised Borders and the Right to Exit Within Europe

ABSTRACT This paper investigates how countries within Europe limit and control the right to exit of negatively racialised minorities, especially Roma. Based on a socio‐legal analysis of four case studies, the paper argues that ‘countries of origin’ limit the right to exit in collaboration with possible countries of destination. They do so by making different multilateral and bilateral agreements, which promise countries of origin a sort of reward (like visa‐free travel for majority citizens), while countries of destination use it as a ‘remote control’ to prevent access to their territory to unwanted migrants. The paper discusses the following examples: first, the case of the UK's border officers being stationed at the Prague airport, disproportionately not allowing Roma to board flights to the UK. Second, it discusses the incentives France used to discourage Romani EU citizens from leaving Romania and Bulgaria towards France. Third, it investigates European Parliament restrictions on the visa‐free regime, should there be a greater number of Romani asylum seekers from non‐EU former Yugoslav countries. And fourth, the impediments Romani refugees faced when trying to exit Ukraine after the full‐scale Russian invasion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70087
Primary Topic
Romani and Gypsy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting Racialised Borders and the Right to Exit Within Europe

Julija Sardelić
International Migration
Romani and Gypsy Studies
article

Shifting Racialised Borders and the Right to Exit Within Europe

Julija Sardelić
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates how countries within Europe limit and control the right to exit of negatively racialised minorities, especially Roma. Based on a socio‐legal analysis of four case studies, the paper argues that ‘countries of origin’ limit the right to exit in collaboration with possible countries of destination. They do so by making different multilateral and bilateral agreements, which promise countries of origin a sort of reward (like visa‐free travel for majority citizens), while countries of destination use it as a ‘remote control’ to prevent access to their territory to unwanted migrants. The paper discusses the following examples: first, the case of the UK's border officers being stationed at the Prague airport, disproportionately not allowing Roma to board flights to the UK. Second, it discusses the incentives France used to discourage Romani EU citizens from leaving Romania and Bulgaria towards France. Third, it investigates European Parliament restrictions on the visa‐free regime, should there be a greater number of Romani asylum seekers from non‐EU former Yugoslav countries. And fourth, the impediments Romani refugees faced when trying to exit Ukraine after the full‐scale Russian invasion.

International MigrationVol. 63(6)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Romani and Gypsy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.