P15.15.A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’ PERSPECTIVES ON DELIVERING REHABILITATION TO ADULTS WITH HIGH GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND While rehabilitation therapy can improve functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with high grade glioma, there is minimal literature available to guide recommendations when working with this group of patients in a rehabilitation setting. The aim of this study was to understand the challenges and opportunities that healthcare professionals report about delivering rehabilitation to patients with glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS To meet study aims, we performed focus groups with healthcare professionals in an outpatient community-based rehabilitation setting in the Midwest region of the United States. Healthcare professionals with and without experience working with patients with high-grade glioma were recruited. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Eight focus groups with a total of 29 healthcare professionals were conducted. Six focus groups (n = 21) were conducted with healthcare professionals who self-identified as having experience working with patients with high grade glioma, while the remaining two focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with healthcare professionals who identified as not experienced with this patient group. Ten participants were occupational therapists, ten were physical therapists, six were speech and language pathologists, three were other healthcare professionals. Mean age was 35.3 years (age range 24-61 years). Five participants were male (17.2%). The overarching notion resulting from the analysis was outlining Factors influencing therapy process. Within that six themes were identified: (1) Unique challenges in the context of high-grade brain tumor, (2) Awareness of prognosis, (3) Communication with oncology team, (4) Role of rehabilitation during end-of-life, (5) Impact on therapists, and (6) Role of family. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals outlined the emotional and professional impact and challenges related to working with patients with high grade glioma. Since healthcare professionals who participated in this study were not based in a neuro-oncology setting, they were able to compare their experience of working with patients with high grade glioma with that of delivering rehabilitation to patients with other conditions, such as stroke or traumatic brain injury. The study brings insight into the role of rehabilitation therapy from the clinicians’ perspective and the findings will help with the development of rehabilitation guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.505
Primary Topic
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P15.15.A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’ PERSPECTIVES ON DELIVERING REHABILITATION TO ADULTS WITH HIGH GRADE GLIOMA

Anna Zanotto, Florien Willemijn Boele, Rebecca N. Glover, Klaus Hansen
Neuro-Oncology
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
article

P15.15.A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’ PERSPECTIVES ON DELIVERING REHABILITATION TO ADULTS WITH HIGH GRADE GLIOMA

Anna Zanotto, Florien Willemijn Boele, Rebecca N. Glover, Klaus Hansen
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND While rehabilitation therapy can improve functional outcomes and quality of life of patients with high grade glioma, there is minimal literature available to guide recommendations when working with this group of patients in a rehabilitation setting. The aim of this study was to understand the challenges and opportunities that healthcare professionals report about delivering rehabilitation to patients with glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS To meet study aims, we performed focus groups with healthcare professionals in an outpatient community-based rehabilitation setting in the Midwest region of the United States. Healthcare professionals with and without experience working with patients with high-grade glioma were recruited. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Eight focus groups with a total of 29 healthcare professionals were conducted. Six focus groups (n = 21) were conducted with healthcare professionals who self-identified as having experience working with patients with high grade glioma, while the remaining two focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with healthcare professionals who identified as not experienced with this patient group. Ten participants were occupational therapists, ten were physical therapists, six were speech and language pathologists, three were other healthcare professionals. Mean age was 35.3 years (age range 24-61 years). Five participants were male (17.2%). The overarching notion resulting from the analysis was outlining Factors influencing therapy process. Within that six themes were identified: (1) Unique challenges in the context of high-grade brain tumor, (2) Awareness of prognosis, (3) Communication with oncology team, (4) Role of rehabilitation during end-of-life, (5) Impact on therapists, and (6) Role of family. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals outlined the emotional and professional impact and challenges related to working with patients with high grade glioma. Since healthcare professionals who participated in this study were not based in a neuro-oncology setting, they were able to compare their experience of working with patients with high grade glioma with that of delivering rehabilitation to patients with other conditions, such as stroke or traumatic brain injury. The study brings insight into the role of rehabilitation therapy from the clinicians’ perspective and the findings will help with the development of rehabilitation guidelines.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.