P11.38.A PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DYNAMIC BRAIN METASTASIS METRICS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MULTIPLE COURSES OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY

Abstract BACKGROUND Optimizing the timing of repeat focal radiosurgery versus transition to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases remains unresolved. Traditional static indices like the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) may not fully capture evolving intracranial disease burden. We investigated whether dynamic growth metrics—cumulative Brain Metastasis Velocity (cBMV), volumetric Brain Metastasis Velocity (vBMV), and initial BMV (iBMV)—could better guide treatment sequencing. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this single-center, retrospective cohort (2018-2024), 122 patients with a total of 817 brain metastases underwent ≥2 courses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypofractionated SRS (HFSRT), or WBRT. We calculated cBMV (metastases/year), vBMV (cm³/year), and iBMV (first-interval growth rate) for each patient. Associations with overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and time to WBRT (WBFS) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards, and competing-risks models. Discrimination was quantified using Harrell’s C-index, and clinical thresholds (<4, 4-13, >13 metastases/year) were applied to cBMV. RESULTS Patients received a median of two radiotherapy courses (range 2-6). Low cBMV (<4/year) was linked to prolonged OS (median 35.4 months) compared with intermediate (16.2 months) and high (>13/year; 13.3 months) groups (p<0.001 for OS, iPFS, WBFS). vBMV similarly stratified outcomes (OS p<0.001; iPFS p=0.001; WBFS p=0.009). In contrast, iBMV did not predict any endpoint (all p>0.7). DS-GPA achieved modest discrimination for OS (C-index 0.552), whereas cBMV and vBMV outperformed it (C-index 0.742 and 0.731, respectively). CONCLUSION Dynamic velocity metrics, particularly cBMV and vBMV, offer robust prognostic stratification in patients undergoing repeated SRS. These measures can identify those with slow progression who may safely continue focal treatments and those with rapid lesion accrual warranting earlier WBRT, thereby enabling more personalized radiotherapeutic decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.377
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P11.38.A PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DYNAMIC BRAIN METASTASIS METRICS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MULTIPLE COURSES OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY

Stephan Schönecker, Sebastian H. Maier, Johannes Rübenthaler, Alexander Nitschmann et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

P11.38.A PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DYNAMIC BRAIN METASTASIS METRICS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MULTIPLE COURSES OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY

Stephan Schönecker, Sebastian H. Maier, Johannes Rübenthaler, Alexander Nitschmann, Paul Rogowski, Daniel F. Fleischmann, C Belka, S Corradini, S. Marschner, L. Horne, Diana-Coralia Dehelean, Niklas Oberwegner
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Optimizing the timing of repeat focal radiosurgery versus transition to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases remains unresolved. Traditional static indices like the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) may not fully capture evolving intracranial disease burden. We investigated whether dynamic growth metrics—cumulative Brain Metastasis Velocity (cBMV), volumetric Brain Metastasis Velocity (vBMV), and initial BMV (iBMV)—could better guide treatment sequencing. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this single-center, retrospective cohort (2018-2024), 122 patients with a total of 817 brain metastases underwent ≥2 courses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypofractionated SRS (HFSRT), or WBRT. We calculated cBMV (metastases/year), vBMV (cm³/year), and iBMV (first-interval growth rate) for each patient. Associations with overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and time to WBRT (WBFS) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards, and competing-risks models. Discrimination was quantified using Harrell’s C-index, and clinical thresholds (<4, 4-13, >13 metastases/year) were applied to cBMV. RESULTS Patients received a median of two radiotherapy courses (range 2-6). Low cBMV (<4/year) was linked to prolonged OS (median 35.4 months) compared with intermediate (16.2 months) and high (>13/year; 13.3 months) groups (p<0.001 for OS, iPFS, WBFS). vBMV similarly stratified outcomes (OS p<0.001; iPFS p=0.001; WBFS p=0.009). In contrast, iBMV did not predict any endpoint (all p>0.7). DS-GPA achieved modest discrimination for OS (C-index 0.552), whereas cBMV and vBMV outperformed it (C-index 0.742 and 0.731, respectively). CONCLUSION Dynamic velocity metrics, particularly cBMV and vBMV, offer robust prognostic stratification in patients undergoing repeated SRS. These measures can identify those with slow progression who may safely continue focal treatments and those with rapid lesion accrual warranting earlier WBRT, thereby enabling more personalized radiotherapeutic decision-making.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Centre de Coopération Universitaire Franco-Bavarois (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.