P16.01.A REFLECTIONS ON COLLABORATIONS WITH PATIENT PARTNERS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY HEALTHCARE RESEARCH: RESEARCHERS AND PATIENT PARTNERS PERSPECTIVES

Abstract BACKGROUND There is growing interest in collaborations between patients and researchers in health(care) research. However, there is a disparity between the anticipated positive impact and the frequent well-intentioned but complex realities of collaborative health(care) research. In working with patient partners, we constantly aim to the right way of working that does justice to their knowledge and ‘being’. Nevertheless, in daily practices of collaborative health(care) research, ethical issues can occur, for example: lack of (financial) support, practical problems, and insufficient recognition of the vulnerable position of patient partners. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patient partners in this project are either individuals with a primary malignant brain tumour (glioma) or their spouse. Throughout the participatory work, the first author made notes about the interactions with patient partners. In this study, we reflect on ethical issues from the perspective of the first author while working with patient partners during her PhD research and how she, and we, as a multidisciplinary team, approached and addressed those ethical quandaries. RESULTS We selected three case descriptions in which we describe ethical issues related to: 1) confrontation with negative health status updates of patient partners, 2) influence (deterioration) of cognitive functioning on collaboration in research, and 3) responding to issues that reach beyond research activities. CONCLUSION The reflections on the three case descriptions offer insights into building meaningful partnerships with patient partners diagnosed with a brain tumour and how we can align these in our efforts to work towards (epistemic) justice. Appropriately responding to ethical issues in the collaboration with patient partners is an iterative process and thus ongoing work. In a follow-up study that we are currently working on, we describe reflections from the perspective of the patient partners. We believe that the patient partners have distinctive and valuable insights that can contribute to the understanding in ethical conduct of collaborative health(care) research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.513
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P16.01.A REFLECTIONS ON COLLABORATIONS WITH PATIENT PARTNERS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY HEALTHCARE RESEARCH: RESEARCHERS AND PATIENT PARTNERS PERSPECTIVES

Astrid Janssens, Margot L. Zomers, Tatjana Seute, Anouk M. de Sain et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

P16.01.A REFLECTIONS ON COLLABORATIONS WITH PATIENT PARTNERS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY HEALTHCARE RESEARCH: RESEARCHERS AND PATIENT PARTNERS PERSPECTIVES

Astrid Janssens, Margot L. Zomers, Tatjana Seute, Anouk M. de Sain, Carla Ruis
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND There is growing interest in collaborations between patients and researchers in health(care) research. However, there is a disparity between the anticipated positive impact and the frequent well-intentioned but complex realities of collaborative health(care) research. In working with patient partners, we constantly aim to the right way of working that does justice to their knowledge and ‘being’. Nevertheless, in daily practices of collaborative health(care) research, ethical issues can occur, for example: lack of (financial) support, practical problems, and insufficient recognition of the vulnerable position of patient partners. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patient partners in this project are either individuals with a primary malignant brain tumour (glioma) or their spouse. Throughout the participatory work, the first author made notes about the interactions with patient partners. In this study, we reflect on ethical issues from the perspective of the first author while working with patient partners during her PhD research and how she, and we, as a multidisciplinary team, approached and addressed those ethical quandaries. RESULTS We selected three case descriptions in which we describe ethical issues related to: 1) confrontation with negative health status updates of patient partners, 2) influence (deterioration) of cognitive functioning on collaboration in research, and 3) responding to issues that reach beyond research activities. CONCLUSION The reflections on the three case descriptions offer insights into building meaningful partnerships with patient partners diagnosed with a brain tumour and how we can align these in our efforts to work towards (epistemic) justice. Appropriately responding to ethical issues in the collaboration with patient partners is an iterative process and thus ongoing work. In a follow-up study that we are currently working on, we describe reflections from the perspective of the patient partners. We believe that the patient partners have distinctive and valuable insights that can contribute to the understanding in ethical conduct of collaborative health(care) research.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.