Usability Of “DFU Application” For Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention

Introduction: The development of smart detection software may help reduce the number of decubitus ulcer infections by enabling early identification and management. Ensuring the usability and effectiveness of such technology is essential before widespread adoption. Objective: This study aimed to explore prospective users’ perceptions of the mobile app for detecting diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infection, focusing on its usefulness, ease of use, and overall user satisfaction. Methods: The usability of the DFU app was assessed by experienced users. The evaluation included perceived usefulness, ease of use, and overall satisfaction. Standardized tools such as the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a specific app rating scale were used to collect user feedback. Results: The DFU app received usability ratings ranging from 0.50 to 0.88. The lowest rating was for performance quality (Mean = 0.50, SD = 0.12), while the highest was for integrity (Mean = 0.88, SD = 0.07). The overall usability score, as measured by SUS, was considered acceptable (Mean = 78.4, SD = 6.83). Most users reported no significant issues with using the app, except for difficulty understanding the language used in the interface, which was rated as a serious usability issue with a severity score of 3. Conclusions: Users perceived the DFU app as useful and efficient, particularly in detecting the risk of infection. Despite a noted language comprehension issue, the app demonstrated good overall usability and has the potential to support early intervention for decubitus ulcer prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN KEPERAWATAN INDONESIA
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17509/jpki.v11i1.81809
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usability Of “DFU Application” For Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention

Astri Mutiar, Bayu Erfianto, Bedy Purnama, Linlin Lindayani
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN KEPERAWATAN INDONESIA
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Usability Of “DFU Application” For Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention

Astri Mutiar, Bayu Erfianto, Bedy Purnama, Linlin Lindayani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The development of smart detection software may help reduce the number of decubitus ulcer infections by enabling early identification and management. Ensuring the usability and effectiveness of such technology is essential before widespread adoption. Objective: This study aimed to explore prospective users’ perceptions of the mobile app for detecting diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infection, focusing on its usefulness, ease of use, and overall user satisfaction. Methods: The usability of the DFU app was assessed by experienced users. The evaluation included perceived usefulness, ease of use, and overall satisfaction. Standardized tools such as the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a specific app rating scale were used to collect user feedback. Results: The DFU app received usability ratings ranging from 0.50 to 0.88. The lowest rating was for performance quality (Mean = 0.50, SD = 0.12), while the highest was for integrity (Mean = 0.88, SD = 0.07). The overall usability score, as measured by SUS, was considered acceptable (Mean = 78.4, SD = 6.83). Most users reported no significant issues with using the app, except for difficulty understanding the language used in the interface, which was rated as a serious usability issue with a severity score of 3. Conclusions: Users perceived the DFU app as useful and efficient, particularly in detecting the risk of infection. Despite a noted language comprehension issue, the app demonstrated good overall usability and has the potential to support early intervention for decubitus ulcer prevention.

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN KEPERAWATAN INDONESIAVol. 11(1)
Pancur Kasih Association (ID), Telkom University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.