Multidimensional Analysis of University Students’ Subject Perceptions: Insights from Principal Components

In this study, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to survey data to explore the conscious and unconscious attributes university students associate with different academic subjects and to identify the elements to which they attribute greater significance. The analysis yielded 20 principal components, of which five had eigenvalues exceeding 0.1, with cumulative explained variance reaching 80% by the tenth component. Interpretation of the components revealed that the first principal component reflected a dichotomy between subjects centered on rote memorization and those emphasizing rule-based learning, while the second component distinguished between the humanities and the sciences. Higher-order components were linked to evaluative dimensions of academic engagement, mid-level components reflected the broader epistemological positioning of disciplines, and lower-order components assessed the relational aspects of subjects in the context of interpersonal dynamics. These findings underscore the potential to provide more holistic and interdisciplinary perspectives in advising and enhancing educational practices across diverse academic disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rz3yc_v1
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional Analysis of University Students’ Subject Perceptions: Insights from Principal Components

Noboru Sakai
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Multidimensional Analysis of University Students’ Subject Perceptions: Insights from Principal Components

Noboru Sakai
article en

Abstract

In this study, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to survey data to explore the conscious and unconscious attributes university students associate with different academic subjects and to identify the elements to which they attribute greater significance. The analysis yielded 20 principal components, of which five had eigenvalues exceeding 0.1, with cumulative explained variance reaching 80% by the tenth component. Interpretation of the components revealed that the first principal component reflected a dichotomy between subjects centered on rote memorization and those emphasizing rule-based learning, while the second component distinguished between the humanities and the sciences. Higher-order components were linked to evaluative dimensions of academic engagement, mid-level components reflected the broader epistemological positioning of disciplines, and lower-order components assessed the relational aspects of subjects in the context of interpersonal dynamics. These findings underscore the potential to provide more holistic and interdisciplinary perspectives in advising and enhancing educational practices across diverse academic disciplines.

Tokyo University of Information Sciences (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multidimensional Analysis of University Students’ Subject Perceptions: Insights from Principal Components — Noboru Sakai · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS