Fine-Tuning the Educational Design Process: Lessons from Sustained Development of a Generative AI-Based Classroom Technology

Generative AI is rapidly entering classrooms, yet its evolving affordances and sociotechnical volatility make educational design challenging. Prior research has surfaced design guidelines based on short-term pilots. We present a three-year participatory design case study of a generative AI–based writing tutor deployed across higher education and K–12 contexts. Drawing on design artifacts, observations, interviews, and focus groups, we analyze over 100 design decisions to trace how the system was shaped. Our findings highlight four contributions: (1) a schema of values-based and constraint-driven design decisions for educational generative AI, (2) attention to rapid evolution of perceptions in design and adoption of new educational technologies, (3) principles for sustaining participatory design with teachers “in the loop”, and (4) a discussion of the utility of designing with weaknesses in technology. We extend HCI scholarship on emerging technologies by demonstrating how iterative, sustained, cross-contextual design can yield durable lessons amidst rapid technological change.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/jxa4p_v1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fine-Tuning the Educational Design Process: Lessons from Sustained Development of a Generative AI-Based Classroom Technology

Daniel Ritchie, Mark Warschauer, Tamara Tate
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Fine-Tuning the Educational Design Process: Lessons from Sustained Development of a Generative AI-Based Classroom Technology

Daniel Ritchie, Mark Warschauer, Tamara Tate
article en

Abstract

Generative AI is rapidly entering classrooms, yet its evolving affordances and sociotechnical volatility make educational design challenging. Prior research has surfaced design guidelines based on short-term pilots. We present a three-year participatory design case study of a generative AI–based writing tutor deployed across higher education and K–12 contexts. Drawing on design artifacts, observations, interviews, and focus groups, we analyze over 100 design decisions to trace how the system was shaped. Our findings highlight four contributions: (1) a schema of values-based and constraint-driven design decisions for educational generative AI, (2) attention to rapid evolution of perceptions in design and adoption of new educational technologies, (3) principles for sustaining participatory design with teachers “in the loop”, and (4) a discussion of the utility of designing with weaknesses in technology. We extend HCI scholarship on emerging technologies by demonstrating how iterative, sustained, cross-contextual design can yield durable lessons amidst rapid technological change.

National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.