Addressing the New Standards for Accreditation in Today's Political Climate

The past year has seen many changes in terms of accreditation related to standards of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) related to United States federal mandates. These mandates have led several large accrediting bodies to revise their accrediting standards, including the American Psychological Association and the American Bar Association (Barry, 2025). In addition to federal mandates, many state legislatures and university administrators have also implemented DEI-restrictive policies. Actions that are appropriate in one state (e.g, curriculum addressing DEI) may be outlawed in another, and discouraged by university administration in yet another state. This leads to an uneven ability to implement national accreditation standards across the country. In this seminar, members of the American Library Association Committee on Accreditation (CoA) will discuss efforts to maintain the integrity of the 2023 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies while accommodating the legal and policy-related realities that programs are facing. This panel hopes to provide practical guidance to programs that face anti-DEI legislation. We invite program representatives to this meeting to discuss with us the challenges they face and present suggestions to ameliorate concerns while maintaining strong, stable, and autonomous LIS programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2025.2103
Primary Topic
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the New Standards for Accreditation in Today's Political Climate

Lisa O’Connor, Andrea Copeland, Denice Adkins, Katharine A. Price et al.
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
article

Addressing the New Standards for Accreditation in Today's Political Climate

Lisa O’Connor, Andrea Copeland, Denice Adkins, Katharine A. Price, Joe Sanchez
article en

Abstract

The past year has seen many changes in terms of accreditation related to standards of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) related to United States federal mandates. These mandates have led several large accrediting bodies to revise their accrediting standards, including the American Psychological Association and the American Bar Association (Barry, 2025). In addition to federal mandates, many state legislatures and university administrators have also implemented DEI-restrictive policies. Actions that are appropriate in one state (e.g, curriculum addressing DEI) may be outlawed in another, and discouraged by university administration in yet another state. This leads to an uneven ability to implement national accreditation standards across the country. In this seminar, members of the American Library Association Committee on Accreditation (CoA) will discuss efforts to maintain the integrity of the 2023 Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies while accommodating the legal and policy-related realities that programs are facing. This panel hopes to provide practical guidance to programs that face anti-DEI legislation. We invite program representatives to this meeting to discuss with us the challenges they face and present suggestions to ameliorate concerns while maintaining strong, stable, and autonomous LIS programs.

Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.