Disciplinary Diversity in Academic AI Adoption

This study maps the adoption patterns of AI tools in academic writing by analyzing 7,953 AI usage declarations from journal publications. AI adoption increased from 62.6% (October 2023) to 78.2% (March 2025), approaching a projected 85% saturation level. Physical and Social Sciences show highest adoption rates, while Health and Life Sciences lag behind. ChatGPT dominates across all disciplines (67-75% of usage), with disciplinary preferences emerging: multidisciplinary research favors writing tools while Physical Sciences utilize more translation tools. Language-related functions comprise 80-90% of all usage, with discipline-specific emphasis patterns. Network analysis reveals Physical Sciences exhibit the most diverse tool ecosystem, with ChatGPT serving as the central hub across fields. This first comprehensive cross-disciplinary analysis of actual AI usage patterns contributes valuable insights for academic publishing policies and discipline-specific AI literacy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2025.2052
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplinary Diversity in Academic AI Adoption

N. Xu
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Disciplinary Diversity in Academic AI Adoption

N. Xu
article en

Abstract

This study maps the adoption patterns of AI tools in academic writing by analyzing 7,953 AI usage declarations from journal publications. AI adoption increased from 62.6% (October 2023) to 78.2% (March 2025), approaching a projected 85% saturation level. Physical and Social Sciences show highest adoption rates, while Health and Life Sciences lag behind. ChatGPT dominates across all disciplines (67-75% of usage), with disciplinary preferences emerging: multidisciplinary research favors writing tools while Physical Sciences utilize more translation tools. Language-related functions comprise 80-90% of all usage, with discipline-specific emphasis patterns. Network analysis reveals Physical Sciences exhibit the most diverse tool ecosystem, with ChatGPT serving as the central hub across fields. This first comprehensive cross-disciplinary analysis of actual AI usage patterns contributes valuable insights for academic publishing policies and discipline-specific AI literacy development.

Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disciplinary Diversity in Academic AI Adoption — N. Xu · Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS