Ethical Practices in Ethnographic Archival Representation

This research aims to examine ethical challenges in ethnographic archival workflows, particularly how they intersect with decolonizing pedagogies, community agency, and archival practices. By drawing on participatory and collaborative archival methodologies, this study investigates how archivists navigate tensions between preservation, access, and ethical representation — especially concerning Indigenous and marginalized communities. This research also challenges hierarchical systems that privilege Western archival frameworks over community-driven knowledge by critically evaluating how archival structures reinforce dominant epistemologies. A qualitative case study approach is first employed by integrating sustained participant observation of daily archival workflows and semi-structured interviews with archival professionals. Fieldwork includes direct observations of processing, description, and preservation workflows, along with informal interactions with staff to assess how ethical considerations emerge in practice. Institutional policies on collection development, donor relations, and archival description will be examined to determine their alignment with ethical frameworks, such as those established by the Society of American Archivists. This study also explores efforts to restructure policies to promote equity, accessibility, and cultural responsiveness toward community participation in archival decision-making. To complement qualitative methods, a quantitative companion study provides statistically significant findings demonstrating strong public support for cultural heritage preservation and a willingness to engage in participatory archival events. This research incorporates reflexive archival considerations that account for power dynamics and positionality, and contributes to broader discussions on archival ethics, agency, and institutional accountability. It explores decolonizing pedagogies by critically examining how archives function as both instruments of institutional authority and as potential sites for community empowerment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2025.2096
Primary Topic
Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Practices in Ethnographic Archival Representation

Nathan Brown
Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
article

Ethical Practices in Ethnographic Archival Representation

Nathan Brown
article en

Abstract

This research aims to examine ethical challenges in ethnographic archival workflows, particularly how they intersect with decolonizing pedagogies, community agency, and archival practices. By drawing on participatory and collaborative archival methodologies, this study investigates how archivists navigate tensions between preservation, access, and ethical representation — especially concerning Indigenous and marginalized communities. This research also challenges hierarchical systems that privilege Western archival frameworks over community-driven knowledge by critically evaluating how archival structures reinforce dominant epistemologies. A qualitative case study approach is first employed by integrating sustained participant observation of daily archival workflows and semi-structured interviews with archival professionals. Fieldwork includes direct observations of processing, description, and preservation workflows, along with informal interactions with staff to assess how ethical considerations emerge in practice. Institutional policies on collection development, donor relations, and archival description will be examined to determine their alignment with ethical frameworks, such as those established by the Society of American Archivists. This study also explores efforts to restructure policies to promote equity, accessibility, and cultural responsiveness toward community participation in archival decision-making. To complement qualitative methods, a quantitative companion study provides statistically significant findings demonstrating strong public support for cultural heritage preservation and a willingness to engage in participatory archival events. This research incorporates reflexive archival considerations that account for power dynamics and positionality, and contributes to broader discussions on archival ethics, agency, and institutional accountability. It explores decolonizing pedagogies by critically examining how archives function as both instruments of institutional authority and as potential sites for community empowerment.

Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference
University of North Texas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical Practices in Ethnographic Archival Representation — Nathan Brown · Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS