Performance Comparison of Transition Metal (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)-Fluoride Conversion Cathodes in Thin-Film Solid-State Batteries

Transition metal fluorides (TMFs) are promising alternatives for Li battery cathode active materials as they can show specific capacities up to 619 mAh/g for CrF<sub>3</sub>, compared to 272 mAh/g for LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, a commonly used intercalation cathode. TMFs are intrinsically difficult to study due to their incompatibility with typical liquid electrolytes and the need for conductive additives to ensure sufficient utilization. In this work, thin-film solid-state devices are used to compare six transition metals mixed with LiF in a 1.1:2 TM/LiF ratio (where TM = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, or Cu) without the influence of additive and electrolyte interactions. C/10 delithiated capacities of 540, 113, 402, 407, 566, and 143 mAh/g are shown for (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)-LiF cathodes, respectively. Chromium fluoride consistently outperforms the other cathodes up to 8C (190/219 mAh/g, lithiated/delithiated). Differences between the behavior of the TM-LiF cathodes are explored using electrochemical characterization and atomistic simulations. The choice of TM has a significant impact on cathode performance, which is likely to be connected to their distinct chemical natures, changing the thermodynamics and pathway of the conversion reaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.5c01772
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Transition Metal (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)-Fluoride Conversion Cathodes in Thin-Film Solid-State Batteries

Moritz H. Futscher, Felix C. Mocanu, Yaroslav E. Romanyuk, Arnold Müller et al.
1 citations
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
0.54
article

Performance Comparison of Transition Metal (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)-Fluoride Conversion Cathodes in Thin-Film Solid-State Batteries

Moritz H. Futscher, Felix C. Mocanu, Yaroslav E. Romanyuk, Arnold Müller, Jędrzej K. Morzy, Maksym Yarema, Joel Casella, M. Saiful Islam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Transition metal fluorides (TMFs) are promising alternatives for Li battery cathode active materials as they can show specific capacities up to 619 mAh/g for CrF<sub>3</sub>, compared to 272 mAh/g for LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, a commonly used intercalation cathode. TMFs are intrinsically difficult to study due to their incompatibility with typical liquid electrolytes and the need for conductive additives to ensure sufficient utilization. In this work, thin-film solid-state devices are used to compare six transition metals mixed with LiF in a 1.1:2 TM/LiF ratio (where TM = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, or Cu) without the influence of additive and electrolyte interactions. C/10 delithiated capacities of 540, 113, 402, 407, 566, and 143 mAh/g are shown for (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)-LiF cathodes, respectively. Chromium fluoride consistently outperforms the other cathodes up to 8C (190/219 mAh/g, lithiated/delithiated). Differences between the behavior of the TM-LiF cathodes are explored using electrochemical characterization and atomistic simulations. The choice of TM has a significant impact on cathode performance, which is likely to be connected to their distinct chemical natures, changing the thermodynamics and pathway of the conversion reaction.

ACS Applied Energy MaterialsVol. 8(20)
ETH Zurich (CH), University of Oxford (GB), Institute of Electronics (CN), Institute of Electronics (BG), Ion Beam Applications (France) (FR), Materials Research Group (United States) (US), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.