External Shocks and Monetary Policy Trade-offs in Low-Income Countries

We present an Open Economy HANK model with relevant features for Low-Income Countries (LICs): hand-to-mouth households and a subsistence consumption for tradable goods. With the model calibrated for a representative LIC, we illustrate our broader framework with a shock to external prices. The shock causes a consumption-led recession, an increase in inflation and a drop in real wages. Consumption inequality rises: poor households cannot insure against the shock, unlike richer households who can tap into their wealth. Monetary policy is unable to substantively improve poorer households’ welfare, due to offsetting effects on real wages and labor demand. Simulations of the effects of alternative monetary policy responses on inequality yield similar findings. In this setting, fiscal transfers are a more effective tool for redistribution across households.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IMF Working Paper
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229025836.001
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External Shocks and Monetary Policy Trade-offs in Low-Income Countries

Juan Passadore, Carlos van Hombeeck, Filiz Unsal, Giovanni Sciacovelli
IMF Working Paper
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

External Shocks and Monetary Policy Trade-offs in Low-Income Countries

Juan Passadore, Carlos van Hombeeck, Filiz Unsal, Giovanni Sciacovelli
article en

Abstract

We present an Open Economy HANK model with relevant features for Low-Income Countries (LICs): hand-to-mouth households and a subsistence consumption for tradable goods. With the model calibrated for a representative LIC, we illustrate our broader framework with a shock to external prices. The shock causes a consumption-led recession, an increase in inflation and a drop in real wages. Consumption inequality rises: poor households cannot insure against the shock, unlike richer households who can tap into their wealth. Monetary policy is unable to substantively improve poorer households’ welfare, due to offsetting effects on real wages and labor demand. Simulations of the effects of alternative monetary policy responses on inequality yield similar findings. In this setting, fiscal transfers are a more effective tool for redistribution across households.

IMF Working PaperVol. 2025(204)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.