Average-Case Complexity of Quantum Stabilizer Decoding

Random classical linear codes are widely believed to be hard to decode. While slightly sub-exponential time algorithms exist when the coding rate vanishes sufficiently rapidly, all known algorithms at constant rate require exponential time. By contrast, the complexity of decoding a random quantum stabilizer code has remained an open question for quite some time. This work closes the gap in our understanding of the algorithmic hardness of decoding random quantum versus random classical codes. We prove that decoding a random stabilizer code with even a single logical qubit is at least as hard as decoding a random classical code at constant rate--the maximally hard regime. This result suggests that the easiest random quantum decoding problem is at least as hard as the hardest random classical decoding problem, and shows that any sub-exponential algorithm decoding a typical stabilizer code, at any rate, would immediately imply a breakthrough in cryptography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798129.3800800
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Average-Case Complexity of Quantum Stabilizer Decoding

Andrey Boris Khesin, Alexander Poremba, Jonathan Z. Lu, Vinod Vaikuntanathan et al.
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Average-Case Complexity of Quantum Stabilizer Decoding

Andrey Boris Khesin, Alexander Poremba, Jonathan Z. Lu, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Akshar Ramkumar
article en

Abstract

Random classical linear codes are widely believed to be hard to decode. While slightly sub-exponential time algorithms exist when the coding rate vanishes sufficiently rapidly, all known algorithms at constant rate require exponential time. By contrast, the complexity of decoding a random quantum stabilizer code has remained an open question for quite some time. This work closes the gap in our understanding of the algorithmic hardness of decoding random quantum versus random classical codes. We prove that decoding a random stabilizer code with even a single logical qubit is at least as hard as decoding a random classical code at constant rate--the maximally hard regime. This result suggests that the easiest random quantum decoding problem is at least as hard as the hardest random classical decoding problem, and shows that any sub-exponential algorithm decoding a typical stabilizer code, at any rate, would immediately imply a breakthrough in cryptography.

Boston University (US), California Institute of Technology (US), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Average-Case Complexity of Quantum Stabilizer Decoding — Andrey Boris Khesin, Alexander Poremba, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS