Forging green frontiers: The agonistic potential of energy communities

Drawing on Mouffe's theory of agonistic pluralism, we examine the potential of energy communities (ECs) to discursively forge a progressive frontier for green populism. While the European energy transition remains embedded in neoliberal institutions, ECs are increasingly recognized as a means for democratizing energy production and fostering grassroots participation. Through qualitative, action-oriented research on two Swedish EC-initiatives, we ask whether collective efforts to establish cooperatively owned energy configurations can enable counterhegemonic formations that challenge corporate control over the energy sector. We analyze how key signifiers—“resilience,” “smartness,” and “robustness”—function as discursive nodal points, uniting diverse actors in their opposition to top-down governance. However, we also identify tensions between bottom-up experimentation and institutional constraints. We conclude that while ECs offer a promising platform for political mobilization, their transformative potential depends on their ability to resist cooptation and avoid reinforcing existing electricity grid structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Geography
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786251382139
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forging green frontiers: The agonistic potential of energy communities

Daniel Andersson, Fredrik Envall
Human Geography
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Forging green frontiers: The agonistic potential of energy communities

Daniel Andersson, Fredrik Envall
article en

Abstract

Drawing on Mouffe's theory of agonistic pluralism, we examine the potential of energy communities (ECs) to discursively forge a progressive frontier for green populism. While the European energy transition remains embedded in neoliberal institutions, ECs are increasingly recognized as a means for democratizing energy production and fostering grassroots participation. Through qualitative, action-oriented research on two Swedish EC-initiatives, we ask whether collective efforts to establish cooperatively owned energy configurations can enable counterhegemonic formations that challenge corporate control over the energy sector. We analyze how key signifiers—“resilience,” “smartness,” and “robustness”—function as discursive nodal points, uniting diverse actors in their opposition to top-down governance. However, we also identify tensions between bottom-up experimentation and institutional constraints. We conclude that while ECs offer a promising platform for political mobilization, their transformative potential depends on their ability to resist cooptation and avoid reinforcing existing electricity grid structures.

Human Geography
Linköping University (SE)
Linköpings Universitet, Energimyndigheten
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.