A Focused Ethnography of Researchers Navigating Power Dynamics When Implementing Patient-Oriented Research Practices in a Forensic Mental Health Setting

This ethnographic study explores how a research team navigated power dynamics while developing patient-oriented research practices in a high-secure forensic mental health care setting. Data were collected through team meetings, interviews, and field notes. The study explored how power was understood and addressed at individual, interpersonal, and structural levels. The three themes and six subthemes focused on the importance of acknowledging power within the system, power given to the project through community support, and power held by researchers. Researchers learned to navigate strict policies, procedures, and practices within the forensic environment, focusing on building trust with staff while ensuring patient autonomy and engagement. Equitable communication, particularly with patients, was critical in garnering support for patient-oriented research, often requiring the use of accessible language. Lastly, reflexivity allowed the research team to critically reflect on their biases and positionalities, fostering power-balanced relationships essential for authentic engagement. Findings suggest that addressing power imbalances early and often, and building on the support of staff champions, are key considerations for conducting patient-oriented research in forensic mental health settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013251382955
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Focused Ethnography of Researchers Navigating Power Dynamics When Implementing Patient-Oriented Research Practices in a Forensic Mental Health Setting

Cara Evans, Christopher Canning, Elnaz Moghimi, Katrina J. Allen et al.
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

A Focused Ethnography of Researchers Navigating Power Dynamics When Implementing Patient-Oriented Research Practices in a Forensic Mental Health Setting

Cara Evans, Christopher Canning, Elnaz Moghimi, Katrina J. Allen, Sevil Deljavan, Kayla Zimmermann
article en

Abstract

This ethnographic study explores how a research team navigated power dynamics while developing patient-oriented research practices in a high-secure forensic mental health care setting. Data were collected through team meetings, interviews, and field notes. The study explored how power was understood and addressed at individual, interpersonal, and structural levels. The three themes and six subthemes focused on the importance of acknowledging power within the system, power given to the project through community support, and power held by researchers. Researchers learned to navigate strict policies, procedures, and practices within the forensic environment, focusing on building trust with staff while ensuring patient autonomy and engagement. Equitable communication, particularly with patients, was critical in garnering support for patient-oriented research, often requiring the use of accessible language. Lastly, reflexivity allowed the research team to critically reflect on their biases and positionalities, fostering power-balanced relationships essential for authentic engagement. Findings suggest that addressing power imbalances early and often, and building on the support of staff champions, are key considerations for conducting patient-oriented research in forensic mental health settings.

International Journal of Forensic Mental HealthVol. 25(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CA), Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.