Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings

ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382697
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings

Ismat Annan, Nicola Marie Stock, Usama S. Hamdan, Dana Andari et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings

Ismat Annan, Nicola Marie Stock, Usama S. Hamdan, Dana Andari, Roland K. Assaf, Giuliana Roggiero
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
University of the West of England (GB), Smile Train (US), American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.