Sex differences in the thermoregulatory and cardiovascular response to exercise in hot environmental conditions

Exercise during heat exposure induces skin microvascular and systemic cardiovascular changes. When standardized exercise tasks are completed, such as during military training or in workplace settings, sex differences in responses may be apparent. Nineteen males and 19 females participated in a set-pace laboratory walking test (treadmill walking 5 km/h; 2% incline) in a climate chamber (40°C; 50% RH) for 90 min. Body composition (DXA) and aerobic capacity (V̇o<sub>2max</sub>) were measured in a preliminary session. Metabolic heat production, skin blood flow (SkBF; laser Doppler flowmetry), limb blood flow (Doppler ultrasound), stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇o<sub>2</sub>), and core temperature (Tc) were measured at baseline, 30, 60, and 90 min. No sex difference in Tc at 90 min was evident (male 38.3 ± 0.5°C vs. female 38.5 ± 0.4°C; <i>P</i> = 0.403) and a similar change from baseline to 90 min (Δ 1.40 vs. 1.28°C; <i>P</i> = 0.447) occurred, despite males producing more heat (3.4 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7 W/kg; <i>P</i> = 0.001), exhibiting higher SkBF (192 ± 50 vs. 160 ± 21 PU; <i>P</i> = 0.026), and higher sweat production rate (16.5 ± 5.1 vs. 12.3 ± 3.3 mL/min; <i>P</i> = 0.009). Males also had higher CO (7.25 ± 1.38 vs. 6.11 ± 1.72 L/min; group <i>P</i> = 0.026) and femoral blood flow (1.00 ± 0.23 vs. 8.22 ± 0.19 L/min; <i>P</i> = 0.026) responses than females. Males compensated for more lean mass and higher metabolic heat production via a larger increase in cardiac output, with more blood flow distributed to active muscle and, as heat and exercise exposure continued, to the skin. Tc in females did not rise more than in males, possibly due to body size and/or anthropometric factors.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In military, workplace, and sporting settings, challenging environmental conditions while performing external workloads are not always avoidable. We assessed sex differences during a 90-min treadmill walk (40°C). Males produced more metabolic heat, had higher skin blood flow, sweat rate, and cardiac output than females. Change in core temperature remained similar between sexes, challenging the proposition that women are more heat-intolerant than men. Our findings underscore the need for tailored heat tolerance strategies for both sexes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00139.2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in the thermoregulatory and cardiovascular response to exercise in hot environmental conditions

Shane Kevin Maloney, Louise H. Naylor, Howard H. Carter, Juliene Gonçalves Costa et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
article

Sex differences in the thermoregulatory and cardiovascular response to exercise in hot environmental conditions

Shane Kevin Maloney, Louise H. Naylor, Howard H. Carter, Juliene Gonçalves Costa, João Carlos Locatelli, Robert A. McLaughlin, Keith George, Helen Jones, Andrew Haynes, Kristanti Wanito Wigati, DANIEL JOHN GREEN, Julie Collis, J. Criddle, Xingwei Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Exercise during heat exposure induces skin microvascular and systemic cardiovascular changes. When standardized exercise tasks are completed, such as during military training or in workplace settings, sex differences in responses may be apparent. Nineteen males and 19 females participated in a set-pace laboratory walking test (treadmill walking 5 km/h; 2% incline) in a climate chamber (40°C; 50% RH) for 90 min. Body composition (DXA) and aerobic capacity (V̇o<sub>2max</sub>) were measured in a preliminary session. Metabolic heat production, skin blood flow (SkBF; laser Doppler flowmetry), limb blood flow (Doppler ultrasound), stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇o<sub>2</sub>), and core temperature (Tc) were measured at baseline, 30, 60, and 90 min. No sex difference in Tc at 90 min was evident (male 38.3 ± 0.5°C vs. female 38.5 ± 0.4°C; <i>P</i> = 0.403) and a similar change from baseline to 90 min (Δ 1.40 vs. 1.28°C; <i>P</i> = 0.447) occurred, despite males producing more heat (3.4 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7 W/kg; <i>P</i> = 0.001), exhibiting higher SkBF (192 ± 50 vs. 160 ± 21 PU; <i>P</i> = 0.026), and higher sweat production rate (16.5 ± 5.1 vs. 12.3 ± 3.3 mL/min; <i>P</i> = 0.009). Males also had higher CO (7.25 ± 1.38 vs. 6.11 ± 1.72 L/min; group <i>P</i> = 0.026) and femoral blood flow (1.00 ± 0.23 vs. 8.22 ± 0.19 L/min; <i>P</i> = 0.026) responses than females. Males compensated for more lean mass and higher metabolic heat production via a larger increase in cardiac output, with more blood flow distributed to active muscle and, as heat and exercise exposure continued, to the skin. Tc in females did not rise more than in males, possibly due to body size and/or anthropometric factors.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In military, workplace, and sporting settings, challenging environmental conditions while performing external workloads are not always avoidable. We assessed sex differences during a 90-min treadmill walk (40°C). Males produced more metabolic heat, had higher skin blood flow, sweat rate, and cardiac output than females. Change in core temperature remained similar between sexes, challenging the proposition that women are more heat-intolerant than men. Our findings underscore the need for tailored heat tolerance strategies for both sexes.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyVol. 329(5)
The University of Western Australia (AU), Universitas Airlangga (ID), The University of Adelaide (AU), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.