P11.03.B EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR)-T CELL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY CNS LYMPHOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract BACKGROUND Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL), but its role in patients with secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement is less established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in this specific population. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of CAR T-cell therapy in adult patients with B-NHL and secondary CNS involvement. Outcomes of interest included Complete response, CNS response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). RESULTS We included 19 studies with 518 patients of whom 289 had systemic disease at time of CAR-T therapy. Complete response rates were observed in 54% of patients (95% CI 0.43-0.65; I²=78%), while CNS response rates were reported in 58% of patients (95% CI 0.28-0.87; I²=89%). Proportions of adverse events including CRS (95% CI 0.72-0.96; i²=88%) and ICANS (95% CI 0.37-0.59; i²=78%) were 84% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that CAR T-cell therapy provides significant systemic and CNS responses and reduces progression in B-NHL patients with secondary CNS involvement, though neurotoxicity remains a notable concern for neuro-oncology practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.342
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P11.03.B EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR)-T CELL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY CNS LYMPHOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Geraldo Medeiros, Dulce Aparecida Barbosa, Natasha Maranhão Vieira Rodrigues, Tibor Schuster et al.
Neuro-Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

P11.03.B EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR)-T CELL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY CNS LYMPHOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Geraldo Medeiros, Dulce Aparecida Barbosa, Natasha Maranhão Vieira Rodrigues, Tibor Schuster, Trajano Aguiar Pires Gonçalves, Camila Dermínio Donadel, Thales Pardini Fagundes, Marisa D. Santos, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, A V de Jesus, Rebeca Alessi Tedeschi Pachega
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL), but its role in patients with secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement is less established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in this specific population. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of CAR T-cell therapy in adult patients with B-NHL and secondary CNS involvement. Outcomes of interest included Complete response, CNS response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). RESULTS We included 19 studies with 518 patients of whom 289 had systemic disease at time of CAR-T therapy. Complete response rates were observed in 54% of patients (95% CI 0.43-0.65; I²=78%), while CNS response rates were reported in 58% of patients (95% CI 0.28-0.87; I²=89%). Proportions of adverse events including CRS (95% CI 0.72-0.96; i²=88%) and ICANS (95% CI 0.37-0.59; i²=78%) were 84% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that CAR T-cell therapy provides significant systemic and CNS responses and reduces progression in B-NHL patients with secondary CNS involvement, though neurotoxicity remains a notable concern for neuro-oncology practice.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_3)
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Asunción (PY), San Sebastián University (CL), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR), Universidade do Oeste Paulista (BR), Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR), Franciscan University (BR), Instituto Universitario Italiano de Rosario (AR), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.