Interfacial Strength Testing of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Samples Produced Using the Multi-Material Binning Method

Creating complex structures using multiple materials in additive manufacturing comes with a unique set of challenges, particularly when it comes to how the materials transition and bond together. This research looks at a new powder binning method for combining metal powders to create multi-material components in a single build, all produced on a standard Laser Powder Bed Fusion EOS M 290 machine. The study focuses on the size and quality of the resulting multi-material interfaces and how different scan strategies used affect the interface strength. The strength of the interface between different material pairings is evaluated for combinations of 316 stainless steel bonded to Inconel 718, Inconel 718 bonded to Inconel 625, and Inconel 625 bonded to 316 stainless steel. The Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) and interface region lengths were calculated to be 675 MPa and 1250 µm for 316L–IN718, 1004 MPa and 2500 µm for IN718–IN625, and 687 MPa and 2000 µm for IN625–316L, respectively. The findings show that the laser powder bed fusion material binning method is comparable to traditional methods, such as welding or directed energy deposition. This suggests that the new material binning method offers clear advantages when it comes to enabling complex geometry multi-material components while maintaining the strength and durability of the bonds between different metal materials found in traditional means. Further, optimization of scan strategies in the interface zones could play a significant role in improving the overall performance of these multi-material components, which is particularly important for industries such as aerospace, automotive, and energy production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9100327
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interfacial Strength Testing of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Samples Produced Using the Multi-Material Binning Method

Suyash Niraula, J. K. Gillham, Thomas A. Berfield, Brendon S. Dodge
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Interfacial Strength Testing of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Samples Produced Using the Multi-Material Binning Method

Suyash Niraula, J. K. Gillham, Thomas A. Berfield, Brendon S. Dodge
article en

Abstract

Creating complex structures using multiple materials in additive manufacturing comes with a unique set of challenges, particularly when it comes to how the materials transition and bond together. This research looks at a new powder binning method for combining metal powders to create multi-material components in a single build, all produced on a standard Laser Powder Bed Fusion EOS M 290 machine. The study focuses on the size and quality of the resulting multi-material interfaces and how different scan strategies used affect the interface strength. The strength of the interface between different material pairings is evaluated for combinations of 316 stainless steel bonded to Inconel 718, Inconel 718 bonded to Inconel 625, and Inconel 625 bonded to 316 stainless steel. The Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) and interface region lengths were calculated to be 675 MPa and 1250 µm for 316L–IN718, 1004 MPa and 2500 µm for IN718–IN625, and 687 MPa and 2000 µm for IN625–316L, respectively. The findings show that the laser powder bed fusion material binning method is comparable to traditional methods, such as welding or directed energy deposition. This suggests that the new material binning method offers clear advantages when it comes to enabling complex geometry multi-material components while maintaining the strength and durability of the bonds between different metal materials found in traditional means. Further, optimization of scan strategies in the interface zones could play a significant role in improving the overall performance of these multi-material components, which is particularly important for industries such as aerospace, automotive, and energy production.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 9(10)
University of Louisville (US), Manufacturing Institute (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, University of Louisville
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.