Engineering Law and Cybersecurity in Digital Health: Legal-Informatics Frameworks for Regulating Cross-Border Data Interoperability, Liability, and Resilience in Public Health Communication Systems

The proliferation of digital health technologies and public health informatics has transformed healthcare delivery and global health governance by enabling real-time data exchange, precision interventions, and transnational collaboration. Yet, these innovations also expose critical vulnerabilities in cybersecurity, liability allocation, and regulatory coherence. This article investigates these challenges through the lens of engineering law, proposing a legal-informatics framework for governing cross-border data interoperability and resilience in public health communication systems. The central research problem addressed is how engineering law—traditionally applied to physical infrastructures—can be reimagined to regulate digital health platforms in ways that embed safety-by-design, compliance-by-architecture, and accountability-by-default into system development and governance. Methodologically, the study employs a comparative legal analysis of the European Union, United States, and China, combined with socio-technical evaluation of interoperability standards, liability models, and resilience mechanisms. Primary legal instruments (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, NIS2 Directive, Cybersecurity Law of China), international standards (ISO/IEC 27001, HL7 FHIR, IEC 62443), and case studies (e.g., the EU Digital COVID Certificate, African CDC data platforms) form the empirical basis of the analysis. The findings demonstrate that fragmented legal frameworks and inconsistent liability regimes undermine the resilience of digital health infrastructures, leaving systems vulnerable to cyber threats and regulatory fragmentation. To address these shortcomings, the article proposes a four-pillar regulatory model grounded in interoperability, cybersecurity safeguards, liability allocation, and resilience mechanisms. By operationalising these pillars, the study contributes a novel legal-informatics framework that strengthens both accountability and systemic security. Ultimately, the article offers policymakers, engineers, and legal scholars a structured blueprint for harmonising digital health regulation, advancing transnational public health resilience, and safeguarding trust in an increasingly interconnected digital healthcare ecosystem.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.1215000139p
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering Law and Cybersecurity in Digital Health: Legal-Informatics Frameworks for Regulating Cross-Border Data Interoperability, Liability, and Resilience in Public Health Communication Systems

Grace Perpetual Dafiel, Samira Umar Balarabe
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Engineering Law and Cybersecurity in Digital Health: Legal-Informatics Frameworks for Regulating Cross-Border Data Interoperability, Liability, and Resilience in Public Health Communication Systems

Grace Perpetual Dafiel, Samira Umar Balarabe
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of digital health technologies and public health informatics has transformed healthcare delivery and global health governance by enabling real-time data exchange, precision interventions, and transnational collaboration. Yet, these innovations also expose critical vulnerabilities in cybersecurity, liability allocation, and regulatory coherence. This article investigates these challenges through the lens of engineering law, proposing a legal-informatics framework for governing cross-border data interoperability and resilience in public health communication systems. The central research problem addressed is how engineering law—traditionally applied to physical infrastructures—can be reimagined to regulate digital health platforms in ways that embed safety-by-design, compliance-by-architecture, and accountability-by-default into system development and governance. Methodologically, the study employs a comparative legal analysis of the European Union, United States, and China, combined with socio-technical evaluation of interoperability standards, liability models, and resilience mechanisms. Primary legal instruments (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, NIS2 Directive, Cybersecurity Law of China), international standards (ISO/IEC 27001, HL7 FHIR, IEC 62443), and case studies (e.g., the EU Digital COVID Certificate, African CDC data platforms) form the empirical basis of the analysis. The findings demonstrate that fragmented legal frameworks and inconsistent liability regimes undermine the resilience of digital health infrastructures, leaving systems vulnerable to cyber threats and regulatory fragmentation. To address these shortcomings, the article proposes a four-pillar regulatory model grounded in interoperability, cybersecurity safeguards, liability allocation, and resilience mechanisms. By operationalising these pillars, the study contributes a novel legal-informatics framework that strengthens both accountability and systemic security. Ultimately, the article offers policymakers, engineers, and legal scholars a structured blueprint for harmonising digital health regulation, advancing transnational public health resilience, and safeguarding trust in an increasingly interconnected digital healthcare ecosystem.

International journal of research and scientific innovationVol. XII(XV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.