From foreign prototype to local production

The aim of this article is to identify the multi-directional networks of influence that shaped ceramic production in the Modern period within the territory of present-day Poland, and to examine the factors that led to the development of local characteristics. The discussion emphasises the phenomenon of connectivity, understood as the evolving relationships between foreign producers, external sources of inspiration, and indigenous artisans. The analysis focuses on selected groups of vessels – namely slipware, so-called Pomeranian faience, and Stettinware. These types of earthenware became popular for both table use and display during the 16th to 19th century. Drawing on examples of archaeological finds, I aim to demonstrate that while these productions emerged from a shared tradition, they developed distinctive characteristics shaped by a range of local factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archeologické rozhledy
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2025.279
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From foreign prototype to local production

Magdalena Bis
Archeologické rozhledy
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

From foreign prototype to local production

Magdalena Bis
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify the multi-directional networks of influence that shaped ceramic production in the Modern period within the territory of present-day Poland, and to examine the factors that led to the development of local characteristics. The discussion emphasises the phenomenon of connectivity, understood as the evolving relationships between foreign producers, external sources of inspiration, and indigenous artisans. The analysis focuses on selected groups of vessels – namely slipware, so-called Pomeranian faience, and Stettinware. These types of earthenware became popular for both table use and display during the 16th to 19th century. Drawing on examples of archaeological finds, I aim to demonstrate that while these productions emerged from a shared tradition, they developed distinctive characteristics shaped by a range of local factors.

Archeologické rozhledyVol. 77(3)
Institute of Archaeology (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.