The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-Report Measures of Reliance on Rules, Cost-Benefit Reasoning, Intuition, & Deliberation in (Moral) Decision-Making
Understanding how people make decisions in specific situations is a central challenge in (moral) psychology research. Yet there are no existing self-report scales for measuring the process of decision-making in individual dilemmas (as opposed to general moral attitudes or beliefs about moral decision-making). We address this gap by devising new self-report measures of several of the processes by which people make moral decisions and validate them using realistic moral dilemmas, including six new vignettes that we developed. The resulting 12-item Decision Process Scale (DPS) can be used to measure how much people rely on rules versus cost-benefit reasoning and how much they rely on intuition versus deliberation in the specific moral dilemmas they face in a laboratory experiment or in the real world.
Authors
- Vanessa Cheung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-6184)
- Maximilian Maier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9873-6096)
- Falk Lieder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-6110)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zfmp9_v3
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Business and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00