When does a drop stop bouncing on a cold surface?

Drop bouncing is intriguing when interacting with solidification, and yet, such an interaction is less known. This paper delves into drop bouncing in practical three-dimensional printing conditions. A phase field model coupled with the enthalpy porosity model is employed to capture the evolving liquid–gas and liquid–solid interfaces. The model is discretized using a finite difference method on a half-staggered grid and is run in a parallel fashion. The parameters influencing drop bouncing are investigated. They include impact velocity, drop size, and surface wettability. Moreover, a theoretical model based on energy analysis is put forward to predict drop bouncing on cold surfaces. The major findings are as follows. For a fixed undercooling, increasing the impact velocity or reducing the contact angle will significantly reduce drop bouncing, while increasing the drop size does little to mitigate bouncing. The theoretical model suggests that for a fixed undercooling, bouncing is avoided if the maximum spread is larger than the critical value predicted by the theoretical model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0291426
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does a drop stop bouncing on a cold surface?

Mingguang Shen, Ben Q. Li
Journal of Applied Physics
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
article

When does a drop stop bouncing on a cold surface?

Mingguang Shen, Ben Q. Li
article en

Abstract

Drop bouncing is intriguing when interacting with solidification, and yet, such an interaction is less known. This paper delves into drop bouncing in practical three-dimensional printing conditions. A phase field model coupled with the enthalpy porosity model is employed to capture the evolving liquid–gas and liquid–solid interfaces. The model is discretized using a finite difference method on a half-staggered grid and is run in a parallel fashion. The parameters influencing drop bouncing are investigated. They include impact velocity, drop size, and surface wettability. Moreover, a theoretical model based on energy analysis is put forward to predict drop bouncing on cold surfaces. The major findings are as follows. For a fixed undercooling, increasing the impact velocity or reducing the contact angle will significantly reduce drop bouncing, while increasing the drop size does little to mitigate bouncing. The theoretical model suggests that for a fixed undercooling, bouncing is avoided if the maximum spread is larger than the critical value predicted by the theoretical model.

Journal of Applied PhysicsVol. 138(13)
University of Michigan–Dearborn (US), Yancheng Teachers University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.