Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells fed with ash-free bagasse versus bagasse-derived biochar: A comparative study

• Ash-free bagasse is a promising carbon–neutral DC-SOFC fuel. • Bagasse-fed SOFCs outperform biochar: 324 vs 277 mW/cm 2 @800 °C. • Direct bagasse-fed SOFC suffers cell failure due to fuel interruption. • Both fuels can cause carbon deposition on the anode. Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells (DC-SOFCs) have attracted considerable attention as highly efficient power generation systems. This study provides a comparative assessment of performance and operational stability of Ni-YSZ anode-supported SOFCs fueled by ash-free raw bagasse versus its pyrolyzed biochar. Structural analysis confirmed pyrolysis-driven transformation of bagasse into a carbon-enriched biochar, evidenced by an elevated C/O ratio (7.6 vs. 1.6). Electrochemical evaluation demonstrated that SOFCs operating on direct bagasse achieved higher peak power density (324 mW/cm 2 at 800 °C) than those fueled by bagasse-derived biochar (277 mW/cm 2 ), which is attributed to the in-situ generation of pyrolysis gases (H 2 /CO/CH 4 ) during operation. Durability tests revealed divergent failure mechanisms: biochar-fueled cells experienced voltage collapse after 20 h at 0.3 A/cm 2 due to carbon depletion, whereas direct bagasse operation exhibited premature failure within 10 h at 0.4 A/cm 2 owing to fuel supply discontinuity. This study reveals that ash-free bagasse is a promising carbon–neutral fuel for SOFCs, and underscores the need for strategies to ensure continuous fuel delivery for sustained operation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137049
Primary Topic
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells fed with ash-free bagasse versus bagasse-derived biochar: A comparative study

Hairen Tan, Zongying Han, Jie Chen, Han Zhang et al.
Fuel
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
article

Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells fed with ash-free bagasse versus bagasse-derived biochar: A comparative study

Hairen Tan, Zongying Han, Jie Chen, Han Zhang, Haisheng Wang, Zexun Han
article en

Abstract

• Ash-free bagasse is a promising carbon–neutral DC-SOFC fuel. • Bagasse-fed SOFCs outperform biochar: 324 vs 277 mW/cm 2 @800 °C. • Direct bagasse-fed SOFC suffers cell failure due to fuel interruption. • Both fuels can cause carbon deposition on the anode. Direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells (DC-SOFCs) have attracted considerable attention as highly efficient power generation systems. This study provides a comparative assessment of performance and operational stability of Ni-YSZ anode-supported SOFCs fueled by ash-free raw bagasse versus its pyrolyzed biochar. Structural analysis confirmed pyrolysis-driven transformation of bagasse into a carbon-enriched biochar, evidenced by an elevated C/O ratio (7.6 vs. 1.6). Electrochemical evaluation demonstrated that SOFCs operating on direct bagasse achieved higher peak power density (324 mW/cm 2 at 800 °C) than those fueled by bagasse-derived biochar (277 mW/cm 2 ), which is attributed to the in-situ generation of pyrolysis gases (H 2 /CO/CH 4 ) during operation. Durability tests revealed divergent failure mechanisms: biochar-fueled cells experienced voltage collapse after 20 h at 0.3 A/cm 2 due to carbon depletion, whereas direct bagasse operation exhibited premature failure within 10 h at 0.4 A/cm 2 owing to fuel supply discontinuity. This study reveals that ash-free bagasse is a promising carbon–neutral fuel for SOFCs, and underscores the need for strategies to ensure continuous fuel delivery for sustained operation.

FuelVol. 406
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.